These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 105403)

  • 1. Selective expression of antibody classes and contact sensitivity affected by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Asherson GL
    Scand J Immunol; 1979; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 105403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antibody responses to contact sensitizing agents. Effect of sensitized cells.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Wood PJ; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1978 Mar; 34(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 305889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induction and modification of anti-TNP reaginic and IgG antibody responses by reactive trinitrophenyl derivatives.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Jouhal SS; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1978 Oct; 35(4):673-82. PubMed ID: 361549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaginic antibody produced in mice with contact sensitivity.
    Thomas WR; Asherson GL; Watkins MC
    J Exp Med; 1976 Nov; 144(5):1386-90. PubMed ID: 993730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immunogenic cells in the regional lymph nodes after painting with the contact sensitizers picryl chloride and oxazolone: evidence for the presence of IgM antibody on their surface.
    Asherson GL; Colizzi V; Watkins MC
    Immunology; 1983 Mar; 48(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 6826205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antigen-restricted antigenic competition induced by 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene: association with depression of lymphocyte proliferation.
    Kimber I; Bentley AN; Ward RK; Baker D; Turk JL
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1990; 91(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 1693914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalence of conventional anti-picryl T suppressor factor in the contact sensitivity system and monoclonal anti-NP TsF3: their final non-specific effect via the T acceptor cell.
    Asherson GL; Dorf ME; Colizzi V; Zembala M; James BM
    Immunology; 1984 Nov; 53(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 6333385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reaginic antibody to contact sensitizing agents. Occurrence of cells which supress IgG and not reagin responses.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Asherson GL
    Immunology; 1978 Jul; 35(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 79547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. T suppressor cells and suppressor factor which act at the efferent stage of the contact sensitivity skin reaction: their production by mice injected with water-soluble, chemically reactive derivatives of oxazolone and picryl chloride.
    Asherson GL; Zembala M
    Immunology; 1980 Dec; 41(4):1005-13. PubMed ID: 6450725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed hypersensitivity in mast-cell-deficient mice.
    Thomas WR; Schrader JW
    J Immunol; 1983 Jun; 130(6):2565-7. PubMed ID: 6602168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppression of antibody responses by cells from mice treated with picryl sulfonic acid: T cells that suppress IgG antibody without inhibiting concomitant IgE responses.
    Thomas WR; Watkins MC; Cox KO; Asherson GL
    J Immunol; 1981 Jul; 127(1):217-20. PubMed ID: 6165765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of dendritic cells in the initiation of immune responses to contact sensitizers. II. Studies in nude mice.
    Knight SC; Bedford P; Hunt R
    Cell Immunol; 1985 Sep; 94(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 3875419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of the immune response. I. Depression of DNA synthesis by immune lymph node cells.
    Asherson GL; Wood PJ; Mayhew B
    Immunology; 1975 Dec; 29(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 1193682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of contact sensitivity. Selective induction of delayed hypersensitivity by the injection of cells from draining lymph nodes into the footpads of normal recipients.
    Thomas WR; Asherson GL; Perera MA
    Immunology; 1978 Apr; 34(4):725-31. PubMed ID: 721137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How many class II immune response genes? A reappraisal of the evidence.
    Simpson E; Lieberman R; Andó I; Sachs DH; Paul WE; Berzofsky JA
    Immunogenetics; 1986; 23(5):302-8. PubMed ID: 3086223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic control of two different types of antibody responses to oxazolone.
    Andó I; Fachet J
    Eur J Immunol; 1977 Aug; 7(8):516-9. PubMed ID: 902679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Requirements for antigenic competition in contact sensitivity.
    Kimber I; Cumberbatch M; Bentley AN; Baker D
    J Clin Lab Immunol; 1990 Jun; 32(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 1967041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depression of contact sensitivity by enhancement of suppressor cell activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-injected mice.
    Colizzi V; Garzelli C; Campa M; Falcone G
    Infect Immun; 1978 Aug; 21(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 99365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contact sensitivity and the DNA response in mice to high and low doses of oxazolone: low dose unresponsiveness following painting and feeding and its prevention by pretreatment with cyclophosphamide.
    Asherson GL; Perera MA; Thomas WR
    Immunology; 1979 Mar; 36(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 312260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Definitive mapping of the immune response gene(s) for (T,G)-A--L to the I-A subregion.
    Markman M; Dickler HB
    J Immunol; 1980 Jun; 124(6):2909-11. PubMed ID: 6768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.