BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10540644)

  • 1. Mucinous versus nonmucinous rectal carcinomas: differentiation with MR imaging.
    Hussain SM; Outwater EK; Siegelman ES
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 10540644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis.
    Yuen S; Uematsu T; Kasami M; Tanaka K; Kimura K; Sanuki J; Uchida Y; Furukawa H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 17326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy in differentiation of mucinous and nonmucinous rectal carcinoma on MR imaging.
    Kim MJ; Park JS; Park SI; Kim NK; Kim JH; Moon HJ; Park YN; Kim WH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 12544243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
    Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mucinous carcinoma of the breast: MRI features of pure and mixed forms with histopathologic correlation.
    Monzawa S; Yokokawa M; Sakuma T; Takao S; Hirokaga K; Hanioka K; Adachi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):W125-31. PubMed ID: 19234240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging.
    Vogl TJ; Pegios W; Mack MG; Hünerbein M; Hintze R; Adler A; Lobbeck H; Hammerstingl R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1427-34. PubMed ID: 9168702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rectal carcinoma: high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and T2 quantification in rectal cancer specimens.
    Stollfuss JC; Becker K; Sendler A; Seidl S; Settles M; Auer F; Beer A; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 16928975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rectal carcinoma: double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging.
    Wallengren NO; Holtås S; Andrén-Sandberg A; Jonsson E; Kristoffersson DT; McGill S
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 10751475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Locally advanced rectal cancer: MR imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy. Part II. What are the criteria to predict involved lymph nodes?
    Lahaye MJ; Beets GL; Engelen SM; Kessels AG; de Bruïne AP; Kwee HW; van Engelshoven JM; van de Velde CJ; Beets-Tan RG
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 19403848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Markedly high signal intensity lesions in the uterine cervix on T2-weighted imaging: differentiation between mucin-producing carcinomas and nabothian cysts.
    Li H; Sugimura K; Okizuka H; Yoshida M; Maruyama R; Takahashi K; Miyazaki K
    Radiat Med; 1999; 17(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10399782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of small, functional islet cell tumors in the pancreas: selection of MR imaging sequences for optimal sensitivity.
    Thoeni RF; Mueller-Lisse UG; Chan R; Do NK; Shyn PB
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 10671597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement.
    Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences and signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: visual evaluation of brain tumors.
    Kubota T; Yamada K; Kizu O; Hirota T; Ito H; Ishihara K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 15906343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.