These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10541106)

  • 1. Interobserver variability in the interpretation of renal digital subtraction angiography.
    Paul JF; Cherrak I; Jaulent MC; Chatellier G; Plouin PF; Degoulet P; Gaux JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1285-8. PubMed ID: 10541106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.
    Korst MB; Joosten FB; Postma CT; Jager GJ; Krabbe JK; Barentsz JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 10701600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.
    Kaatee R; Beek FJ; de Lange EE; van Leeuwen MS; Smits HF; van der Ven PJ; Beutler JJ; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 9314973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences.
    Loubeyre P; Trolliet P; Cahen R; Grozel F; Labeeuw M; Minh VA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):489-94. PubMed ID: 8686634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Wasser MN; Westenberg J; van der Hulst VP; van Baalen J; van Bockel JH; van Erkel AR; Pattynama PM
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 9015052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
    Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
    Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
    Kim D; Porter DH; Brown R; Crivello MS; Silva P; Leeming BW
    Angiology; 1991 May; 42(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 2035886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Wilms GE; Baert AL; Staessen JA; Amery AK
    Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):713-5. PubMed ID: 3526406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Loubeyre P; Revel D; Garcia P; Delignette A; Canet E; Chirossel P; Genin G; Amiel M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.
    Thornton MJ; Thornton F; O'Callaghan J; Varghese JC; O'Brien E; Walshe J; Lee MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1279-83. PubMed ID: 10541105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: ostial or truncal?
    Kaatee R; Beek FJ; Verschuyl EJ; vd Ven PJ; Beutler JJ; van Schaik JP; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 8637979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of main renal artery stenosis using phase-contrast cine MR angiography.
    Silverman JM; Friedman ML; Van Allan RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 8615257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography.
    de Vries AR; Engels PH; Overtoom TT; Saltzherr TP; Geyskes BG
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(6):277-81. PubMed ID: 6391782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-observer variability in the angiographic assessment of renal artery stenosis. DRASTIC study group. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative.
    van Jaarsveld BC; Pieterman H; van Dijk LC; van Seijen AJ; Krijnen P; Derkx FH; Man in't Veld AJ; Schalekamp MA
    J Hypertens; 1999 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):1731-6. PubMed ID: 10658939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Can the degree of renal artery stenosis be automatically quantified?].
    Cherrak I; Jaulent MC; Azizi M; Plouin PF; Degoulet P; Chatellier G
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Aug; 93(8):1047-52. PubMed ID: 10989755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
    Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Sutter R; Nanz D; Lutz AM; Pfammatter T; Seifert B; Struwe A; Heilmaier C; Weishaupt D; Marincek B; Willmann JK
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17717331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.