These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10541662)

  • 1. Proving the authenticity of ancient DNA by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Hummel S; Herrmann B; Rameckers J; Müller D; Sperling K; Neitzel H; Tönnies H
    Naturwissenschaften; 1999 Oct; 86(10):500-3. PubMed ID: 10541662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
    Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
    Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
    Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First systematic CGH-based analyses of ancient DNA samples of malformed fetuses preserved in the Meckel Anatomical Collection in Halle/Saale (Germany).
    Tönnies H; Gerlach A; Klunker R; Schultka R; Göbbel L
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2005 Mar; 53(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 15750025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Harada T; Shiraishi K; Kusano N; Umayahara K; Kondoh S; Okita K; Sasaki K
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 2000 Nov; 91(11):1119-25. PubMed ID: 11092976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA amplification and chromosomal translocations are accompanied by chromosomal instability: analysis of seven human colon cancer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping.
    Tsushimi T; Noshima S; Oga A; Esato K; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Apr; 126(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 11343776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resolution of genotypic heterogeneity in prostate tumors using polymerase chain reaction and comparative genomic hybridization on microdissected carcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia foci.
    Beheshti B; Vukovic B; Marrano P; Squire JA; Park PC
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2002 Aug; 137(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12377408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of genomic imbalances by comparative genomic hybridization in Chinese fetuses with malformations.
    Wang Y; Meng JL; Wang XT; Zhao YR; Wang LC; Simpson JL; Chen ZJ
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Aug; 28(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 17693969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
    Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The application of comparative genomic hybridization as an additional tool in the chromosome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.
    Kim MH; Stewart J; Devlin C; Kim YT; Boyd E; Connor M
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Apr; 126(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11343775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Detection of submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities by comparative genomic hybridization].
    Kirchhoff M; Rose H; Gerdes T; Lundsteen C
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Oct; 163(41):5652-7. PubMed ID: 11665466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes with complex karyotypes by high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization and subtelomeric CGH array.
    Martínez-Ramírez A; Urioste M; Melchor L; Blesa D; Valle L; de Andrés SA; Kok K; Calasanz MJ; Cigudosa JC; Benítez J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2005 Mar; 42(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 15611930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative genomic hybridization of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.
    Bürki NG; Caduff R; Walt H; Moll C; Pejovic T; Haller U; Ward DC
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 88(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 11058878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined spectral karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and in vitro apoptyping of a panel of Burkitt's lymphoma-derived B cell lines reveals an unexpected complexity of chromosomal aberrations and a recurrence of specific abnormalities in chemoresistant cell lines.
    Karpova MB; Schoumans J; Blennow E; Ernberg I; Henter JI; Smirnov AF; Nordenskjöld M; Fadeel B
    Int J Oncol; 2006 Mar; 28(3):605-17. PubMed ID: 16465364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization in a human endometriosis-derived cell line.
    Gogusev J; Bouquet de Jolinière J; Telvi L; Doussau M; du Manoir S; Stojkoski A; Levardon M
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2000 Sep; 6(9):821-7. PubMed ID: 10956554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
    Rao PH
    Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    Pinkel D; Albertson DG
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2005; 6():331-54. PubMed ID: 16124865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic DNA-chip hybridization reveals a higher incidence of genomic amplifications in pancreatic cancer than conventional comparative genomic hybridization and leads to the identification of novel candidate genes.
    Holzmann K; Kohlhammer H; Schwaenen C; Wessendorf S; Kestler HA; Schwoerer A; Rau B; Radlwimmer B; Döhner H; Lichter P; Gress T; Bentz M
    Cancer Res; 2004 Jul; 64(13):4428-33. PubMed ID: 15231651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonrandom chromosomal imbalances in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma detected by arbitrarily primed PCR fingerprinting.
    Scarpa A; Taruscio D; Scardoni M; Iosi F; Paradisi S; Ennas MG; Rigaud G; Moore PS; Menestrina F
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Nov; 26(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 10502317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.