These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1054214)

  • 1. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.
    Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1975 Feb; 67(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 1054214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
    Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of the "Wits" appraisal.
    Jacobson A
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Aug; 70(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 1066054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 3479897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?
    Nagar S; Nagar R; Raghav P
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2014 Oct; 5(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 25395770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of Wits appraisal with superimposition method].
    Xu T; Ahn J; Baumrind S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 34(4):211-3. PubMed ID: 11776907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
    So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal.
    Rushton R; Cohen AM; Linney AD
    Br J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 18(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1931857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
    Chandra PK; Godfrey K
    Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.