211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10544302)
1. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
Hadgu A
Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1391-9. PubMed ID: 9232760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
Hadgu A
Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of tests used to detect infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic pregnant women: a systematic review.
Sahi SV; Rogozińska E; Sobhy S; Khan KS
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 29(6):375-382. PubMed ID: 28914654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanded gold standard in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a low prevalence population: diagnostic efficacy of tissue culture, direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, PCR and serology.
Thejls H; Gnarpe J; Gnarpe H; Larsson PG; Platz-Christensen JJ; Ostergaard L; Victor A
Genitourin Med; 1994 Oct; 70(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 8001937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.
Green TA; Black CM; Johnson RE
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 9466744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of screening tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis: bias associated with the patient-infected-status algorithm.
Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Wang L
Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 22157304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9097):217-8. PubMed ID: 9449898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of APTIMA COMBO 2 assay with polymerase chain reaction Roche assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.
Khryanin AA; Reshetnikov OV; Vlaspolder F
Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Dec; 18(12):871-2. PubMed ID: 18073027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore.
Tan HH; Chan R
Singapore Med J; 2005 May; 46(5):215-8. PubMed ID: 15858689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of detection methods for Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens obtained from pediatric victims of suspected sexual abuse.
Matthews-Greer J; Sloop G; Springer A; McRae K; LaHaye E; Jamison R
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 1999 Feb; 18(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 10048693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and aspects of the laboratory diagnostics.
Svensson LO; Mares I; Olsson SE; Nordström ML
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):587-90. PubMed ID: 1785275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Martin DH; Nsuami M; Schachter J; Hook EW; Ferrero D; Quinn TC; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4749-58. PubMed ID: 15472336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection.
Biro FM; Reising SF; Doughman JA; Kollar LM; Rosenthal SL
Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections--2002.
Johnson RE; Newhall WJ; Papp JR; Knapp JS; Black CM; Gift TL; Steece R; Markowitz LE; Devine OJ; Walsh CM; Wang S; Gunter DC; Irwin KL; DeLisle S; Berman SM
MMWR Recomm Rep; 2002 Oct; 51(RR-15):1-38; quiz CE1-4. PubMed ID: 12418541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women by the Papanicolaou technique, enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction.
Bañuelos Pánuco CA; Deleón Rodríguez I; Hernández Méndez JT; Martínez Guzmán LA; Akle Fierro D; Miranda Murillo J; Reyes Maldonado E
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 10740593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Chilean men and with urethritis. Usefulness of first catch urine samples].
Romero J; Prado V; Gaete V; Martínez J; Pizarro E
Rev Med Chil; 1997 Oct; 125(10):1165-71. PubMed ID: 9609034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
