These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10544312)

  • 1. Asymptotic power calculations: description, examples, computer code.
    Brown BW; Lovato J; Russell K
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):3137-51. PubMed ID: 10544312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical power of likelihood ratio and Wald tests in latent class models with covariates.
    Gudicha DW; Schmittmann VD; Vermunt JK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1824-1837. PubMed ID: 28039681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likelihood ratio tests for a dose-response effect using multiple nonlinear regression models.
    Gutjahr G; Bornkamp B
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 27399200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On power and sample size calculations for likelihood ratio tests in generalized linear models.
    Shieh G
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1192-6. PubMed ID: 11129478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy.
    Han SS; Chang JT
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):226-41. PubMed ID: 20029057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appropriate likelihood ratio tests and marginal distributions for evolutionary tree models with constraints on parameters.
    Ota R; Waddell PJ; Hasegawa M; Shimodaira H; Kishino H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 May; 17(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 10779540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses.
    Lyles RH; Lin HM; Williamson JM
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1632-48. PubMed ID: 16817148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculation for comparing two negative binomial rates.
    Zhu H; Lakkis H
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):376-87. PubMed ID: 24038204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the correction of the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic if nuisance parameters are estimated based on an external source.
    Jonker M; Van der Vaart A
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 24837490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculating asymptotic significance levels of the constrained likelihood ratio test with application to multivariate genetic linkage analysis.
    Morris NJ; Elston R; Stein CM
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article 39. PubMed ID: 19799558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.
    Emily M; Friguet C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2780-2799. PubMed ID: 26468267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A general approach for sample size and power calculations based on the Haseman-Elston method.
    Hädicke O; Pahlke F; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 18383449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact power calculations when the dependent variable is a single proportion and the number of events is small.
    Hoehler FK
    Comput Biol Med; 1995 Sep; 25(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 8575162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hypothesis testing at the extremes: fast and robust association for high-throughput data.
    Zhou YH; Wright FA
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jul; 16(3):611-25. PubMed ID: 25792622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homogeneity test for correlated binary data.
    Ma C; Shan G; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124337. PubMed ID: 25897962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial likelihood ratio tests for the Cox model under complex sampling.
    Lumley T; Scott A
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):110-23. PubMed ID: 22806928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
    Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oracle estimation of parametric models under boundary constraints.
    Wong KY; Goldberg Y; Fine JP
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 27060984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.