These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10544616)

  • 1. [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].
    Jensen K; Abel U
    Med Klin (Munich); 1999 Sep; 94(9):522-9. PubMed ID: 10544616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in study planning and evaluation].
    Jensen K; Abel U
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):54-60. PubMed ID: 10851849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Moons KG; van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(26):1256-61. PubMed ID: 10908955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to conduct a high-quality original study on a diagnostic research topic.
    Yao X; Vella E
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):305-309. PubMed ID: 28807251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of composite reference standards in diagnostic research.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Bertens LC; van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5605. PubMed ID: 24162938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of flow rate testing in urology.
    Patel HR; Garcia-Montes F; Christopher N; Reeves BC; Emberton M
    BJU Int; 2003 Jul; 92(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12823384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to conduct a high-quality original study on a prognostic research topic.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):A9-A13. PubMed ID: 30454711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG;
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jan; 49(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 12507954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Jan; 138(1):W1-12. PubMed ID: 12513067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 29549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The STARD initiative and the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Bruns DE
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jan; 49(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 12507955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
    Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
    Rossi P
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Methods for evaluating diagnostic tests in Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica].
    Ramos JM; Hernández I
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1998 Apr; 16(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 9646562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do we need a checklist for reporting the results of diagnostic test evaluations? The STARD proposal.
    Gatsonis C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):599-600. PubMed ID: 12809411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.