These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10545807)

  • 1. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss.
    von Ilberg C; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Pfenningdorff T; Hartmann R; Stürzebecher E; Klinke R
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 10545807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.
    Dorman MF; Gifford RH; Spahr AJ; McKarns SA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 18057874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.
    Lenarz T; Stover T; Buechner A; Paasche G; Briggs R; Risi F; Pesch J; Battmer RD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():34-41. PubMed ID: 17063009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.
    Heffer LF; Sly DJ; Fallon JB; White MW; Shepherd RK; O'Leary SJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3124-35. PubMed ID: 20926607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electric-acoustic stimulation: for whom, in which ear, and how.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Plant K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 25614258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
    Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.
    Gstoettner WK; Helbig S; Maier N; Kiefer J; Radeloff A; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():49-56. PubMed ID: 17063011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Olds J; Gaboury I; McCrae R; Schramm D; Durieux-Smith A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22340747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of the application of a frequency transposition hearing system in children.
    MacArdle BM; West C; Bradley J; Worth S; Mackenzie J; Bellman SC
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Feb; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11314907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.