These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10545866)

  • 1. Substantial equivalence: its uses and abuses.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1042-3. PubMed ID: 10545866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
    Formanek R
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetically engineered organic food?
    Hoyle R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Mar; 16(3):214. PubMed ID: 9527990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EU--US experts urge stiffer rules for biotech foods.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Feb; 19(2):106-7. PubMed ID: 11175716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FDA not yet moved by biotech food critics.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 10625375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology food standards hunger for scientific rationale.
    Miller HI
    Trends Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):232-3. PubMed ID: 10802557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
    Mandal GN
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The end of big government?
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):111. PubMed ID: 9035118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond 'substantial equivalence'.
    Millstone E; Brunner E; Mayer S
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6753):525-6. PubMed ID: 10524614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biotechnology for enhancing plant production and food quality: IBS 2010 part III.
    Lacroix C; Langridge P; Tuberosa R
    J Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 159(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 22617685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
    Miller HI
    Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taking the hex off transgenic plant exports.
    Hoyle R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1628. PubMed ID: 9634830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US calls for early data on transgenic crop safety.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):571. PubMed ID: 12167819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic ID.
    Fagan J
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 9592378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.