179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10545899)
21. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
Snow A
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Food: Inside the hothouses of industry.
Gilbert N
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):548-51. PubMed ID: 20671688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The fit between organic and pharma crops in North Carolina.
Williams CG
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Feb; 25(2):166-7; discussion 167. PubMed ID: 17287742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Verdict still out on biotech crops.
Ervin D
Science; 2010 May; 328(5982):1105-6. PubMed ID: 20508111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Asexual crops whet industry appetite.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):109-110. PubMed ID: 30718879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
Sandermann H
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Drugs in crops (continued).
Phillips GC
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):655-6. PubMed ID: 15175676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Democratization is more than lower prices.
Cayford J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Food security: translational agriculture.
Bennett AB
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):429. PubMed ID: 20413477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Agbiotech goes further afield.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):379. PubMed ID: 16601710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Biotech panel set up in US may help allay public fears.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6736):508. PubMed ID: 10376584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Turning plants into protein factories.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1191-3. PubMed ID: 17033647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Co-existence of agricultural production systems.
Jank B; Rath J; Gaugitsch H
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):198-200. PubMed ID: 16545877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
