393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10546777)
1. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Wears RL; Delke I; Gaudier FL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 9083326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Austin SC; Sanchez-Ramos L; Adair CD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):624.e1-9. PubMed ID: 20430362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and induction of labor in women of full-term pregnancy compared with dinoprostone gel: A meta-analysis.
Zeng X; Zhang Y; Tian Q; Xue Y; Sun R; Zheng W; An R
Drug Discov Ther; 2015 Jun; 9(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 26193937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Hughes EG; Kelly AJ; Kavanagh J
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 2):847-55. PubMed ID: 11336776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.
Antonazzo P; Laoreti A; Personeni C; Grossi E; Martinelli A; Cetin I
Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 23(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 26626794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Liu Y; Duan Y; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2382-8. PubMed ID: 26427519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; DiMarco CS; Ramin KD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 12854926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
Mussalli NG
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):474-5. PubMed ID: 10711569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
