These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1054698)
1. Grading your orthodontic treatment results. Gottlieb EL J Clin Orthod; 1975 Mar; 9(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 1054698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of treatment in the adult orthodontic patient as judged by orthodontists and measured by the Objective Grading System. Chaison ET; Liu X; Tuncay OC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):S69-75. PubMed ID: 21435541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Criteria for evaluation of orthodontic treatment]. Mauchamp OP Inf Dent; 1979 Mar; 61(12):983-92. PubMed ID: 286679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Limits in orthodontics. (Evaluation after a time lapse of 7 and one half to 10 and one half years of orthodontic treatment in 4 cases of class 3 malocclusion)]. Riccioli GA Mondo Odontostomatol; 1971; 13(6):975-86. PubMed ID: 5290760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Kuncio D; Maganzini A; Shelton C; Freeman K Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):864-9. PubMed ID: 17685783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics Grading System. Scott SA; Freer TJ Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16433082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment outcomes in 4 modes of orthodontic practice. Poulton D; Vlaskalic V; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):351-4. PubMed ID: 15775950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Putting the plaster on the table. Isaacson RJ Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1132-3. PubMed ID: 18004905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between posttreatment smile esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System. Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Jamieson SA Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18302453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Late results of treatment for overbite]. Sterzik G Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1977; 65(5):499-514. PubMed ID: 143837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fixed orthodontic treatment from the viewpoint of tooth preservation]. Petrin P ZWR; 1979 Jun; 88(11):503-5. PubMed ID: 290106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Oral hygiene as a prerequisite for orthodontic treatment]. Niedballa R; Janson I; Janson M Zahnarztl Prax; 1979 May; 30(5):223-7. PubMed ID: 298138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A 10-year retrospective audit of consecutively completed orthodontic treatments in a general dental practice and a hospital orthodontic department. Atkins EJ Br Dent J; 2002 Jul; 193(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 12199128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]