466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10547837)
1. Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package.
Pearson WR
Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 132():185-219. PubMed ID: 10547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selecting the Right Similarity-Scoring Matrix.
Pearson WR
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2013; 43():3.5.1-3.5.9. PubMed ID: 24509512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective protein sequence comparison.
Pearson WR
Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():227-58. PubMed ID: 8743688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BLAST and FASTA similarity searching for multiple sequence alignment.
Pearson WR
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1079():75-101. PubMed ID: 24170396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases.
Pearson WR
Protein Sci; 1995 Jun; 4(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 7549879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finding Protein and Nucleotide Similarities with FASTA.
Pearson WR
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 53():3.9.1-3.9.25. PubMed ID: 27010337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjusting scoring matrices to correct overextended alignments.
Mills LJ; Pearson WR
Bioinformatics; 2013 Dec; 29(23):3007-13. PubMed ID: 23995390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding homologs in amino acid sequences using network BLAST searches.
Ladunga I
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; Chapter 3():Unit 3.4. PubMed ID: 18428697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical determination of effective gap penalties for sequence comparison.
Reese JT; Pearson WR
Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1500-7. PubMed ID: 12424122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Database similarity searches.
Plewniak F
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 484():361-78. PubMed ID: 18592192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blast sampling for structural and functional analyses.
Friedrich A; Ripp R; Garnier N; Bettler E; Deléage G; Poch O; Moulinier L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 8():62. PubMed ID: 17319945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences.
Pearson WR; Wood T; Zhang Z; Miller W
Genomics; 1997 Nov; 46(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 9403055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Filtering redundancies for sequence similarity search programs.
Cantalloube H; Chomilier J; Chiusa S; Lonquety M; Spadoni JL; Zagury JF
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Feb; 22(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 15588112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments.
Higgins DG; Thompson JD; Gibson TJ
Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():383-402. PubMed ID: 8743695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panning for genes--A visual strategy for identifying novel gene orthologs and paralogs.
Retief JD; Lynch KR; Pearson WR
Genome Res; 1999 Apr; 9(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 10207159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative accuracy of methods for protein sequence similarity search.
Agarwal P; States DJ
Bioinformatics; 1998; 14(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 9520500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA.
Pearson WR
Methods Enzymol; 1990; 183():63-98. PubMed ID: 2156132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finding Homologs in Amino Acid Sequences Using Network BLAST Searches.
Ladunga I
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 59():3.4.1-3.4.24. PubMed ID: 28902395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical statistical estimates for sequence similarity searches.
Pearson WR
J Mol Biol; 1998 Feb; 276(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 9514730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.
Jung J; Lee B
Protein Sci; 2000 Aug; 9(8):1576-88. PubMed ID: 10975579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
