These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Neonatal hearing screening: evaluation of tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emission test criteria. McPherson B; Li SF; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 16672794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Evaluation of hearing by studying acoustic distortion products in noise-induced hearing loss]. Ricci G; Molini E; Alunni N; Gallucci L; Quaglietti G; Cerquetti ME Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10444986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss. Hoth S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 262(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15133692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses. Mills DM Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Study of the correspondence between pure tone and distorsion product otoacoustic emissions audiometrics: basis for an objective cochlear audiometrics model]. Jürgens A; Buisan A; Canela M; Abelló P Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 May; 50(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 10431072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards. Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Job A; Raynal M; Kossowski M; Studler M; Ghernaouti C; Baffioni-Venturi A; Roux A; Darolles C; Guelorget A Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 19249340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss using steady-state evoked potentials. Hsu WC; Wu HP; Liu TC Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2003 Jun; 28(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 12755754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency narrow-band noise on temporary threshold shift in humans. Quaranta A; Scaringi A; Fernandez-Vega S; Quaranta N Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 12701733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The effect of longitudinal noise exposure on behavioral audiograms and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Duvdevany A; Furst M Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):119-27. PubMed ID: 17365065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Temporal patterns of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired cochleae. Avan P; Bonfils P; Loth D; Wit HP Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 8276727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Role of the basal cochlea in the genesis of evoked acoustic oto-emissions in the subject with normal hearing]. el-Bez M; Avan P; Erminy M; François M; Bonfils P Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(8):443-9. PubMed ID: 7645896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Helleman HW; Jansen EJ; Dreschler WA Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):410-9. PubMed ID: 20192875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]