These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10548371)

  • 1. Intensity discrimination, temporal integration and gap detection by normally-hearing subjects with weak and strong otoacoustic emissions.
    Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 10548371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):504-10. PubMed ID: 8675843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.
    McFadden D; Pasanen EG; Maloney MM; Leshikar EM; Pho MH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2355. PubMed ID: 29716248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced àudiogram ripple' in normally-hearing subjects with weak otoacoustic emissions.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 1999; 38(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 10548372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7997834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss.
    Hoth S
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 262(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15133692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds.
    Helleman HW; Jansen EJ; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):410-9. PubMed ID: 20192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing level equalized otoacoustic emissions acquired by swept-tones: intensity characteristics.
    Mihajloski T; Lachowska M; Bennett CL; Ozdamar O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():818-21. PubMed ID: 22254436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Otoacoustic Emissions in Smoking and Nonsmoking Young Adults.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Koziel M; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 8(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26622946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative influence of repeated measurement and of attention on evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Meric C; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Jul; 113(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 8379301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 89():67-71. PubMed ID: 27619031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria for detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1455-61. PubMed ID: 26166450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.
    Baiduc RR; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):300-14. PubMed ID: 24437770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Otoacoustic emissions in young adults: Effects of blood group.
    Chow KT; McPherson B; Fuente A
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():194-200. PubMed ID: 26375628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.