267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10548397)
1. Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment.
Ballard-Barbash R; Klabunde C; Paci E; Broeders M; Coleman EA; Fracheboud J; Bouchard F; Rennert G; Shapiro S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):417-26. PubMed ID: 10548397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries.
Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Taplin S; Thoresen S; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R;
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Dec; 14(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 12515331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening.
Shapiro S; Coleman EA; Broeders M; Codd M; de Koning H; Fracheboud J; Moss S; Paci E; Stachenko S; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Epidemiol; 1998 Oct; 27(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 9839727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
Brown ML; Houn F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. UK breast screening programme: how does it reflect the Forrest recommendations?
Gerard K; Brown J; Johnston K
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9200055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.
Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns EA; Nakano C; Egger J; Carney PA; Abraham L; Taplin SH; D'Orsi CJ; Barlow W; Elmore JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 15671359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
Perry NM
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison.
Hofvind S; Bennett RL; Brisson J; Lee W; Pelletier E; Flugelman A; Geller B
J Med Screen; 2016 Sep; 23(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 26892191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening in Canada: a review.
Wadden N; Doyle GP
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 16579020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the performance and impact of breast cancer screening programmes in East Anglia, U.K. and Bouches du Rhône, France.
McCann J; Wait S; Séradour B; Day N
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Mar; 33(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 9155528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Breast cancer: generalised screening in France from now on].
Séradour B
Rev Prat; 2004 Apr; 54(8):830-6. PubMed ID: 15274453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The professional quality criteria of Italian breast screening radiologists: results from a national survey comparing the programmes started in 2000-2012 versus the ones started in 1990-1999.
Morrone D; Giordano L; Artuso F; Bernardi D; Fedato C; Frigerio A; Giorgi D; Naldoni C; Saguatti G; Severi D; Taffurelli M; Terribile D; Ventura L; Bucchi L
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2017; 53(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 28617264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?
De Koning HJ
Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10674787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The effectiveness of population-based breast cancer screening programme].
Szynglarewicz B; Matkowski R; Kasprzak P; Kotowska J; Forgacz J; Pudełko M; Kornafel J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Feb; 26(152):117-20. PubMed ID: 19388515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence.
Schopper D; de Wolf C
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jul; 45(11):1916-23. PubMed ID: 19398327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic screening programmes in Europe: organization, coverage and participation.
Giordano L; von Karsa L; Tomatis M; Majek O; de Wolf C; Lancucki L; Hofvind S; Nyström L; Segnan N; Ponti A; ; Van Hal G; Martens P; Májek O; Danes J; von Euler-Chelpin M; Aasmaa A; Anttila A; Becker N; Péntek Z; Budai A; Mádai S; Fitzpatrick P; Mooney T; Zappa M; Ventura L; Scharpantgen A; Hofvind S; Seroczynski P; Morais A; Rodrigues V; Bento MJ; Gomes de Carvalho J; Natal C; Prieto M; Sánchez-Contador Escudero C; Zubizarreta Alberti R; Fernández Llanes SB; Ascunce N; Ederra Sanza M; Sarriugarte Irigoien G; Salas Trejo D; Ibáñez Cabanell J; Wiege M; Ohlsson G; Törnberg S; Korzeniewska M; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Patnick J J; Lancucki L; Ducarroz S; Suonio E
J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():72-82. PubMed ID: 22972813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?
Yankaskas BC; Klabunde CN; Ancelle-Park R; Renner G; Wang H; Fracheboud J; Pou G; Bulliard JL;
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 15624239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
