140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10548823)
1. Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women is dependent on site-specific analysis.
Varney LF; Parker RA; Vincelette A; Greenspan SL
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 10548823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in men is dependent on site-specific analysis.
Stoch SA; Wysong E; Connolly C; Parker RA; Greenspan SL
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 11175910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.
Faulkner KG; von Stetten E; Miller P
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 10548828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?
Jørgensen HL; Warming L; Bjarnason NH; Andersen PB; Hassager C
Clin Physiol; 2001 Jan; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11168297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of bone mineral density of the phalanges, lumbar spine, hip, and forearm for the assessment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Mulder JE; Michaeli D; Flaster ER; Siris E
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 11175918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bone density measurement: quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and distal radius. A comparison with dual spectrum X-ray absorptiometry].
Boyanov M; Shinkov A; Nestorova R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Apr; 132(16):869-73. PubMed ID: 17443442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL).
Kullenberg R; Falch JA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Oct; 14(10):823-7. PubMed ID: 12915958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
Larijani B; Dabbaghmanesh MH; Aghakhani S; Sedaghat M; Hamidi Z; Rahimi E
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):941-6. PubMed ID: 15972708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of bone mineral density at distal radius on non-forearm osteoporosis identification.
Trivitayaratana W; Trivitayaratana P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 11460970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.
Salminen H; Sääf M; Ringertz H; Strender LE
Osteoporos Int; 2005 May; 16(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 15448984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Optimal Cut-Points for Weight and Non-Weight Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus to Screen Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women.
Vallipakorn SA; Vallipakorn O; Sophonsritsuk A; Jirapinyo M; Sritara C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Mar; 99(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 27276734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?
Pacheco EM; Harrison EJ; Ward KA; Lunt M; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Jun; 70(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 11960208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone mineral density (BMD) assessment of central skeletal sites from peripheral BMD and ultrasonographic measurements: an improved solution employing age and weight in type 3 regression.
Silberstein EB; Levin LL; Fernandez-Ulloa M; Gass ML; Hughes JH
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 16931351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of radial peripheral quantitative computed tomography, calcaneal ultrasound, and axial dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in women aged 45-55 yr.
Martin JC; Campbell MK; Reid DM
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 10548822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
Boonen S; Nijs J; Borghs H; Peeters H; Vanderschueren D; Luyten FP
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of screening tools for the prediction of low bone mass in African American men.
Sinnott B; Kukreja S; Barengolts E
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(5):684-92. PubMed ID: 16523248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
