286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10548828)
1. Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.
Faulkner KG; von Stetten E; Miller P
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 10548828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordance in lumbar bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women: a prospective comparative study.
Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 36343911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.
Salminen H; Sääf M; Ringertz H; Strender LE
Osteoporos Int; 2005 May; 16(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 15448984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL).
Kullenberg R; Falch JA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Oct; 14(10):823-7. PubMed ID: 12915958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(20):1-180. PubMed ID: 23074491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women is dependent on site-specific analysis.
Varney LF; Parker RA; Vincelette A; Greenspan SL
J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 10548823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison study of the reference curves of bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women.
Wu XP; Liao EY; Huang G; Dai RC; Zhang H
Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Aug; 73(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 14565593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications in the use of T-scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men.
Faulkner KG; Orwoll E
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 11940733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?
Pacheco EM; Harrison EJ; Ward KA; Lunt M; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Jun; 70(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 11960208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee LJ; del Rio AM; Lauder T; Bruce RJ; Summers RM; Pooler BD; Binkley N
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Sep; 26(9):2194-203. PubMed ID: 21590738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study.
Clowes JA; Eastell R; Peel NF
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1794-802. PubMed ID: 15947861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men.
Adler RA; Funkhouser HL; Holt CM
J Clin Densitom; 2001; 4(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 11740064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Site-specific variation in the classification of osteoporosis, and the diagnostic reclassification using the lowest individual lumbar vertebra T-score compared with the L1-L4 mean, in early postmenopausal women.
Sahota O; Pearson D; Cawte SW; San P; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):852-7. PubMed ID: 11199189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?
Jørgensen HL; Warming L; Bjarnason NH; Andersen PB; Hassager C
Clin Physiol; 2001 Jan; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11168297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
