These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10550487)

  • 21. The effects of physical activity on impulsive choice: Influence of sensitivity to reinforcement amount and delay.
    Strickland JC; Feinstein MA; Lacy RT; Smith MA
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():36-45. PubMed ID: 26964905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VI: the effects of ethanol and selective serotonergic drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.
    Evenden JL; Ryan CN
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Oct; 146(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 10550491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of GluN2B-selective antagonists on delay and probability discounting in male rats: Modulation by delay/probability presentation order.
    Yates JR; Prior NA; Chitwood MR; Day HA; Heidel JR; Hopkins SE; Muncie BT; Paradella-Bradley TA; Sestito AP; Vecchiola AN; Wells EE
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Dec; 26(6):525-540. PubMed ID: 30035577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.
    Rodríguez W; Bouzas A; Orduña V
    Learn Behav; 2018 Mar; 46(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 28643142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preference reversals and effects of D-amphetamine on delay discounting in rats.
    Krebs CA; Anderson KG
    Behav Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 23(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 22543814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delay discounting of food by rhesus monkeys: Cocaine and food choice in isomorphic and allomorphic situations.
    Huskinson SL; Woolverton WL; Green L; Myerson J; Freeman KB
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2015 Jun; 23(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 25938515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task.
    Frye CC; Galizio A; Friedel JE; DeHart WB; Odum AL
    J Vis Exp; 2016 Jan; (107):. PubMed ID: 26779747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of reinforcer magnitude on probability and delay discounting of experienced outcomes in a computer game task in humans.
    Greenhow AK; Hunt MJ; Macaskill AC; Harper DN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A within-subject between-apparatus comparison of impulsive choice: T-maze and two-lever chamber.
    Cunningham PJ; Kuhn R; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 26080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The combined effects of delay and probability in discounting.
    Yi R; de la Piedad X; Bickel WK
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16759821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol.
    Richards JB; Zhang L; Mitchell SH; de Wit H
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Mar; 71(2):121-43. PubMed ID: 10220927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Discounting of delayed rewards is not hyperbolic.
    Luhmann CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1274-9. PubMed ID: 23356243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spontaneously hypertensive rats show higher impulsive action, but equal impulsive choice with both positive and aversive consequences.
    González-Barriga F; Orduña V
    Behav Brain Res; 2022 Jun; 427():113858. PubMed ID: 35339564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.
    Richards JB; Mitchell SH; de Wit H; Seiden LS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 May; 67(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 9163939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In search of a definition of reinforcer value: Some successes and failures of the multiplicative hyperbolic model.
    Bradshaw CM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103884. PubMed ID: 31288069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) uncompetitive antagonists in a delay discounting paradigm using a concurrent-chains procedure.
    Yates JR; Gunkel BT; Rogers KK; Breitenstein KA; Hughes MN; Johnson AB; Sharpe SM
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 349():125-129. PubMed ID: 29604367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impulsive choice in inbred strains of mice.
    Otobe T; Makino J
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 15182922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.
    Rodriguez ML; Logue AW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jan; 14(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 3351438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans.
    Pietras CJ; Cherek DR; Lane SD; Tcheremissine OV; Steinberg JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Dec; 170(4):390-8. PubMed ID: 13680085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.