These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10551040)

  • 1. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
    Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Koch I
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Proctor RW; Wang H; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateralized contribution of prefrontal cortex in controlling task-irrelevant information during verbal and spatial working memory tasks: rTMS evidence.
    Sandrini M; Rossini PM; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2056-63. PubMed ID: 18336847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrophysiological investigation of preparatory attentional control in a spatial Stroop task.
    Stern ER; Mangels JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 18(6):1004-17. PubMed ID: 16839306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance.
    Hommel B; Eglau B
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):260-73. PubMed ID: 12466924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information.
    Wühr P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jun; 122(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 16466683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 15910132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical knowledge influences stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Tlauka M; McKenna FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 10718065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.