These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10551105)

  • 1. Creep and visco-elastic recovery of cured and secondary-cured composites and resin-modified glass-ionomers.
    el Hejazi AA; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 1999 Mar; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 10551105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of chemical and light-cured glass ionomer cements bonded to resin composites.
    Farah CS; Orton VG; Collard SM
    Aust Dent J; 1998 Apr; 43(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9612981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-dependent visco-elastic creep and recovery of flowable composites.
    Baroudi K; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Dec; 115(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 18028062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nanoindentation creep versus bulk compressive creep of dental resin-composites.
    El-Safty S; Silikas N; Akhtar R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1171-82. PubMed ID: 22999374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failure of resin-modified glass-ionomers subjected to shear loading.
    Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF
    J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):373-81. PubMed ID: 10377613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding of resin composites to resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Fortin D; Vargas MA; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 7576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of enamel conditioning on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul; 76(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8814631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Kovarik RE; Muncy MV
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 8599593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 16848267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.
    Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Creep behavior of glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Papadogiannis Y; Helvatjoglou-Antoniadi M; Lakes RC; Sapountjis M
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jan; 7(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 1901812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting.
    Dauvillier BS; Feilzer AJ; De Gee AJ; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 2000 Mar; 79(3):818-23. PubMed ID: 10765954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viscoelastic stability of resin-composites aged in food-simulating solvents.
    Marghalani HY; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):963-70. PubMed ID: 23910977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials.
    Attin T; Vataschki M; Hellwig E
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9063235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.
    Ellakuria J; Triana R; Mínguez N; Soler I; Ibaseta G; Maza J; García-Godoy F
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 12686292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.