252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10551757)
1. Relationship between method of detection of breast cancer and stage of disease, method of treatment, and survival in women aged 40 to 49 years.
Maibenco D; Daoud Y; Phillips E; Saxe A
Am Surg; 1999 Nov; 65(11):1061-6. PubMed ID: 10551757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS
CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinoma detection at the breast examination center of Harlem.
Liberman L; Freeman HP; Chandra S; Stein AL; McCord C; Godfrey D; Dershaw DD
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 12115310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is mode of breast cancer detection associated with cancer treatment in the United States?
Yabroff KR; Harlan LC; Clegg LX; Ballard-Barbash R; Stevens J; Weaver DL
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):1011-9. PubMed ID: 18189297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of mass screening mammography on staging of carcinoma of the breast in women.
Robertson FM; Romanow J; Otchy DP; Walters MJ
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Jul; 171(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2360150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of women with breast cancer in Austria by age, stage and period of diagnosis.
Vutuc C; Waldhoer T; Klimont J; Haidinger G; Jakesz R; Kubista E; Zielinski C
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2002 Jun; 114(12):438-42. PubMed ID: 12422577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of physical examination in the absence of a mammographic abnormality for the detection of early-stage breast cancer.
Diratzouian H; Freedman GM; Hanlon AL; Eisenberg DF; Anderson PR
Clin Breast Cancer; 2005 Oct; 6(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 16277883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the impact of breast cancer screening in South Australia.
Tallis GM; O'Neill TJ
Intern Med J; 2009 Mar; 39(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 19383066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body mass and breast cancer. Relationship between method of detection and stage of disease.
Reeves MJ; Newcomb PA; Remington PL; Marcus PM; MacKenzie WR
Cancer; 1996 Jan; 77(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 8625238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Did management of breast carcinoma progress in the 80s?].
Stierli P; Spichtig S; Aeberhard P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1992 Feb; 122(7):217-23. PubMed ID: 1539122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Breast self-examination also valuable in women participating in a screening programme].
Zonderhuis BM; Meijer S; Been J; Groot JJ; Langenhorst F; van den Tol MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2341-5. PubMed ID: 19024066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in breast cancer during three decades in Denmark: stage at diagnosis, surgical management and survival.
Jensen AR; Madsen AH; Overgaard J
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 18465319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of screening-detected breast cancer and trends in its therapy].
Taguchi T; Shiba E; Takai S; Taguchi T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1493-8. PubMed ID: 9725039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors.
Doubeni CA; Field TS; Ulcickas Yood M; Rolnick SJ; Quessenberry CP; Fouayzi H; Gurwitz JH; Wei F
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2482-8. PubMed ID: 16634097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Early detection of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography].
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Kondo H; Kuroda R
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():158-63. PubMed ID: 8037479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relation between the method of detection of initial breast carcinoma and the method of detection of subsequent ipsilateral local recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma.
Chen C; Orel SG; Harris EE; Hwang WT; Solin LJ
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(8):1596-602. PubMed ID: 14534874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing patterns in the clinical characteristics of Korean patients with breast cancer during the last 15 years.
Son BH; Kwak BS; Kim JK; Kim HJ; Hong SJ; Lee JS; Hwang UK; Yoon HS; Ahn SH
Arch Surg; 2006 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16490892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
