These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10552220)
1. The additional hospital costs of the LAURA cochlear implant in the department of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery of the university hospital of Leuven. Vantrappen G; Kesteloot K; Feenstra L Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(9):434-8. PubMed ID: 10552220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The additional hospital costs and outcome of the LAURA Cochlear Implant in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of the University Hospitals, Leuven. Vantrappen G; Kesteloot K; Feenstra L Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 9651616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life. Straatman LV; Huinck WJ; Langereis MC; Snik AF; Mulder JJ Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults. van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users. De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of outcomes for communication mode in cochlear implant in prelingually deafened adults. Oyamada S; Takahashi M; Furutate S; Oka S; Kubota E; Sakurai A; Uekusa T; Iwasaki S Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Apr; 50(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 35710592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults. van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of pre-operative developmental delays on the speech perception of children with cochlear implants. Hiraumi H; Yamamoto N; Sakamoto T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Feb; 40(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 22727355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Oh SH; Kim CS; Kang EJ; Lee DS; Lee HJ; Chang SO; Ahn SH; Hwang CH; Park HJ; Koo JW Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 12701730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit? Kumar RS; Mawman D; Sankaran D; Melling C; O'Driscoll M; Freeman SM; Lloyd SK Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 27099106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults. Leigh JR; Moran M; Hollow R; Dowell RC Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S3-8. PubMed ID: 26963131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults III: prospective evaluation of an actuarial approach to defining a criterion. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 15292776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant. Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Correlation of auditory-verbal skills in patients with cochlear implants and their evaluation in positone emission tomography (PET)]. Łukaszewicz Z; Soluch P; Niemczyk K; Lachowska M Otolaryngol Pol; 2010 Jun; 64(7):10-6. PubMed ID: 21171304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant. Palmer CS; Niparko JK; Wyatt JR; Rothman M; de Lissovoy G Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Nov; 125(11):1221-8. PubMed ID: 10555693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception results--the first 10 years of a cochlear implant program. Hildesheimer M; Teiltelbaum R; Segal O; Tenne S; Kishon-Rabin L; Kronenberg Y; Muchnik C Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):39-41. PubMed ID: 11318478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]