These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10552491)

  • 1. Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum L.).
    Skrabanja V; Liljeberg HG; Hedley CL; Kreft I; Björck IM
    J Agric Food Chem; 1999 May; 47(5):2033-9. PubMed ID: 10552491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of the health benefits of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
    Dahl WJ; Foster LM; Tyler RT
    Br J Nutr; 2012 Aug; 108 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 22916813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistant starch and other dietary fiber components in tubers from a high-amylose potato.
    Zhao X; Andersson M; Andersson R
    Food Chem; 2018 Jun; 251():58-63. PubMed ID: 29426424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glucose and insulin responses to barley products: influence of food structure and amylose-amylopectin ratio.
    Granfeldt Y; Liljeberg H; Drews A; Newman R; Björck I
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1994 May; 59(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 8172094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro and in vivo digestibility of native maize starch granules varying in amylose contents.
    Morita T; Ito Y; Brown IL; Ando R; Kiriyama S
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(6):1628-34. PubMed ID: 18193740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis.
    Asare EK; Jaiswal S; Maley J; Båga M; Sammynaiken R; Rossnagel BG; Chibbar RN
    J Agric Food Chem; 2011 May; 59(9):4743-54. PubMed ID: 21462932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of novel elevated amylose wheats: functional properties and starch digestibility of extruded products.
    Chanvrier H; Appelqvist IA; Bird AR; Gilbert E; Htoon A; Li Z; Lillford PJ; Lopez-Rubio A; Morell MK; Topping DL
    J Agric Food Chem; 2007 Dec; 55(25):10248-57. PubMed ID: 18001033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High amylose wheat starch structures display unique fermentability characteristics, microbial community shifts and enzyme degradation profiles.
    Bui AT; Williams BA; Hoedt EC; Morrison M; Mikkelsen D; Gidley MJ
    Food Funct; 2020 Jun; 11(6):5635-5646. PubMed ID: 32537617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arepas made from high amylose corn flour produce favorably low glucose and insulin responses in healthy humans.
    Granfeldt Y; Drews A; Björck I
    J Nutr; 1995 Mar; 125(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 7876921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of EMS-induced mutation population for amylose and resistant starch variation in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) and identification of candidate genes responsible for amylose variation.
    Mishra A; Singh A; Sharma M; Kumar P; Roy J
    BMC Plant Biol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):217. PubMed ID: 27716051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the functional attributes and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of pea flours having a wide range of amylose content.
    Sun G; Ni P; Lam E; Hrapovic S; Bing D; Yu B; Ai Y
    Food Chem; 2023 Mar; 405(Pt B):134938. PubMed ID: 36436232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro digestibility, protein composition and techno-functional properties of Saskatchewan grown yellow field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by processing.
    Ma Z; Boye JI; Hu X
    Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():64-78. PubMed ID: 28290299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro and in vivo digestibility of corn starch for weaned pigs: Effects of amylose:amylopectin ratio, extrusion, storage duration, and enzyme supplementation.
    Li Y; Zhang AR; Luo HF; Wei H; Zhou Z; Peng J; Ru YJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3512-20. PubMed ID: 26440020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of Cellulose Fiber Particle Size and Starch Type on Expansion During Extrusion Processing.
    Kallu S; Kowalski RJ; Ganjyal GM
    J Food Sci; 2017 Jul; 82(7):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 28613441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro digestibility and some physicochemical properties of starch from wild and cultivated amadumbe corms.
    Naidoo K; Amonsou EO; Oyeyinka SA
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Jul; 125():9-15. PubMed ID: 25857954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of Processing Condition of Instant Rice to Lower the Glycemic Index.
    Ritudomphol O; Luangsakul N
    J Food Sci; 2019 Jan; 84(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 30536382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistant starch as energy.
    Behall KM; Howe JC
    J Am Coll Nutr; 1996 Jun; 15(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 8935440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of cooking methods and starch structures on starch hydrolysis rates of rice.
    Reed MO; Ai Y; Leutcher JL; Jane JL
    J Food Sci; 2013 Jul; 78(7):H1076-81. PubMed ID: 23772830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dietary amylose and amylopectin ratio and resistant starch content affects plasma glucose, lactic acid, hormone levels and protein synthesis in splanchnic tissues.
    Deng J; Wu X; Bin S; Li TJ; Huang R; Liu Z; Liu Y; Ruan Z; Deng Z; Hou Y; Yin YL
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2010 Apr; 94(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 19175452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro hydrolysis and estimated glycemic index of jackfruit seed starch prepared by improved extrusion cooking technology.
    Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Li B; Wang X; Xu F; Zhu K; Tan L; Dong W; Chu Z; Li S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Jan; 121():1109-1117. PubMed ID: 30342148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.