BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10553343)

  • 1. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
    Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [ECG evaluation by the computer using the USPHS program (author's transl)].
    So CS
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Aug; 117(34):1339-44. PubMed ID: 126374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
    Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer-aided ECG diagnostic tool.
    Oweis R; Hijazi L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Mar; 81(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 16488052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Fully automatic computer-analysis of electrocardiograms in clinical routine (author's transl)].
    Mengden HJ; Just H; Kaspar W; Löllgen H; Kersting F
    Z Kardiol; 1978 Oct; 67(10):707-16. PubMed ID: 366940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where do derived precordial leads fail?
    Gregg RE; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Feild DQ; Helfenbein ED
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18817921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-based ECG analysis in acute myocardial infarction. A comparison between two computer programs for the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.
    Hulting J; Blomqvist P; Nygårds ME
    Acta Med Scand; 1977; 201(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 899865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W; Witzleb EJ; Khatibnia U
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telephonic transmission of 12-lead electrocardiograms during acute myocardial infarction.
    Mischke K; Zarse M; Perkuhn M; Knackstedt C; Markus K; Koos R; Schimpf T; Graf J; Hanrath P; Schauerte P
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 15969793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of diagnostic results by a multivariate computer ECG analysis program (AVA 3.5).
    Willems JL; Pardaens J
    Eur J Cardiol; 1977; 6(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 338306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA; Feraco E; Maisano G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME; Thatai D
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.