These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10554550)

  • 41. Measurement of Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer tests in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Cox MJ; Wood IC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 8515973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Landers JA; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 121(12):1705-10. PubMed ID: 14662589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Anderson DR; Levine RA; Fan J; Cello KE; Quigley HA; Budenz DL; Parrish RK; Kass MA; Gordon MO;
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1603-12. PubMed ID: 16949445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
    Wild JM; Moss ID; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Color perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 6717918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
    Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Potential of stratus optical coherence tomography for detecting early glaucoma in perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss.
    Zhang Y; Wu LL; Yang YF
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Jan; 19(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20075675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stimulus parameters for multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry.
    James AC; Kolic M; Bedford SM; Maddess T
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Dec; 21(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 21623219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Blue-yellow perimetry in patients with ocular hypertone.
    Serra A; Zucca I; Tanda A; Piras V; Fossarello M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1998; (227):24-7. PubMed ID: 9972332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparative evaluation of Humphrey perimetry and the multi-channel pattern visual evoked potentials.
    Hu C; Wu L; Wu DZ; Long S
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2000 Sep; 16(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 12579641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The effectiveness of glaucomatous visual field test using a size I stimulus].
    Osako M; Osako S; Hashimoto K; Okano T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Mar; 103(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 10214054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser.
    Greve M; Chisholm IA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 28(5):201-6. PubMed ID: 8221366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Static versus kinetic testing in the nasal peripheral field in patients with glaucoma.
    Stewart WC
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Feb; 70(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1557979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.