These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10554550)

  • 61. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Drance SM; Gaasterland D; Mills RP; Ashburn F; Hnik P; Van Coevorden RE
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Frequency doubling perimetry in ocular hypertension and chronic open angle glaucoma.
    Cellini M; Torreggiani A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2002; 236():24-5. PubMed ID: 12390120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Combined spatial, contrast, and temporal functions perimetry in mild glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    González-Hernández M; García-Feijoó J; Mendez MS; de la Rosa MG
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2004; 14(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 15638101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Detection of early visual field change in ocular hypertension using STATPAC.
    Park HJ; Kim DM; Youn DH; Hong C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2214246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Automated differential threshold perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Duggan C; Sommer A; Auer C; Burkhard K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1985 Sep; 100(3):420-3. PubMed ID: 4037029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.
    Spry PG; Henson DB; Sparrow JM; North RV
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 10877376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.
    Reynolds M; Stewart WC; Sutherland S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1990; 228(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 2401419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Blue-yellow perimetry in the detection of early glaucomatous damage.
    De Jong LA; Snepvangers CE; van den Berg TJ; Langerhorst CT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Oct; 75(3-4):303-14. PubMed ID: 2090405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Factors associated with a learning effect in glaucoma patients using automated perimetry.
    Kulze JC; Stewart WC; Sutherland SE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Dec; 68(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 2080698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Jay JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 77(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8318478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Technique for determining glaucomatous visual field progression by using animation graphics.
    Chauhan BC; Drance SM; LeBlanc RP; Lieberman MF; Mills RP; Werner EB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1994 Oct; 118(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 7943127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Automated perimetry in detecting threats to fixation.
    Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1918-20. PubMed ID: 9373126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Use of suprathreshold test data to predict the results of quantitative testing in the nasal periphery.
    Orr A; Rubillowicz M; LeBlanc R; Seamone C; Mann C
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1990 Apr; 25(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 2361194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.
    Kosoko O; Sommer A; Auer C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 3954641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.
    Hugkulstone CE; Vernon SA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Mar; 75(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 2012781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The association between ocular surface measurements with visual field reliability indices and gaze tracking results in preperimetric glaucoma.
    Arai T; Murata H; Matsuura M; Usui T; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 102(4):525-530. PubMed ID: 28765147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Response properties of normal observers and patients during automated perimetry.
    Nelson-Quigg JM; Twelker JD; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Nov; 107(11):1612-5. PubMed ID: 2818281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry.
    Sanabria O; Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2023737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): a novel technique for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking.
    Murray I; Perperidis A; Brash H; Cameron L; McTrusty A; Fleck B; Minns R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3186-9. PubMed ID: 24110405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.