These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10555082)

  • 1. Encapsulated verses hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Shelton RM; Marquis PM
    Biomaterials; 1999 Nov; 20(22):2147-53. PubMed ID: 10555082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of encapsulated and hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Landini G; Marquis PM
    Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 12092998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of clinically induced variability on the distribution of compressive fracture strengths of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    Dent Mater; 1999 Mar; 15(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 10551100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on the performance of a restorative glass-ionomer dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Farooq AA; Barralet JE
    Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(23):4173-9. PubMed ID: 12853247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of mixing ratio on the toughening mechanisms of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement.
    Fleming GJ; Shelton RM; Landini G; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2001 Jan; 17(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11124409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of clinically induced variability on the bi-axial fracture strength of cemented aluminous core porcelain discs.
    Fleming GJ; Shelton RM; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10483397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An assessment of encapsulated versus hand-mixed glass ionomer restoratives.
    Fleming GJ; Zala DM
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 12670073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes.
    Fleming GJ; Kenny SM; Barralet JE
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16085350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microstructural characterization of dental zinc phosphate cements using combined small angle neutron scattering and microfocus X-ray computed tomography.
    Viani A; Sotiriadis K; Kumpová I; Mancini L; Appavou MS
    Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):402-417. PubMed ID: 28222906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of hand-mixed methods on compressive strength of zinc phosphate dental cement].
    Li HL; Liu D; Bi XQ; Li XY; Chen W; Zhao XX; Yang JB
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 26(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 18605458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts.
    Almufleh BS; Aleisa KI; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):957-63. PubMed ID: 24953755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements.
    Li ZC; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 10220666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength properties of three zinc phosphate cements mixed to two different consistencies.
    Bruce WL; Stevens L
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Apr; 34(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 2730428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of weight loss of liquid on the diametral tensile strengths of various kinds of luting cements.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akça K; Ciftçi Y
    Int Dent J; 1996 Feb; 46(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 8744918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement.
    Nomoto R; Komoriyama M; McCabe JF; Hirano S
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):972-8. PubMed ID: 15501326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is encapsulation of posterior glass-ionomer restoratives the solution to clinically induced variability introduced on mixing?
    Dowling AH; Fleming GJ
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):957-66. PubMed ID: 18177702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.
    Marvin JC; Gallegos SI; Parsaei S; Rodrigues DC
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e705-e712. PubMed ID: 29522263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Black copper phosphate cement: does it have a future?
    Foley J; Evans DJ; Lloyd CH; Blackwell A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Jun; 9(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 11803891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.