These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10555737)

  • 41. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of add power on distance vision with the acuvue bifocal contact lens.
    Ardaya D; DeVuono G; Lin I; Neutgens A; Bergenske P; Caroline P; Smythe J
    Optometry; 2004 Mar; 75(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 15058698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Twelve-month success rates with a hydrogel diffractive bifocal contact lens.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):941-7. PubMed ID: 1300517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of the Tangent Streak trifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 1893537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Sha J; Bakaraju RC; Tilia D; Chung J; Delaney S; Munro A; Ehrmann K; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016 Apr; 79(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 27224066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of the anterior constant focus (ACF) annular bifocal contact lens.
    Gussler JR; Lim ES; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1993 Oct; 19(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 8261605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the ZEBRA 2000 (Z-10) Breger Vision bifocal contact lens.
    Smith VM; Koffler BH; Litteral G
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 11071346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Presbyopic contact lenses.
    Atwood JD
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2000 Aug; 11(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 10977775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Short-Term Visual Performance of Novel Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Bakaraju RC; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Munro A; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Apr; 93(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 26808384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries].
    Peyre C; Fumery L; Gatinel D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16141922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical assessment of Holo-Or trifocal diffractive contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Avraham G; Belkin M
    CLAO J; 1996 Oct; 22(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 8906381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Objective and subjective assessment of a new diffractive trifocal contact lens.
    Fulga V; Schroder S; Belkin M
    Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985); 1996-1997; 19-20():41-4. PubMed ID: 11548785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences.
    Rueff EM; Bailey MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 28343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Mulet ME
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 16023215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles.
    Sanislo S; Wicker D; Green DG
    CLAO J; 1992 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diurnal variations in visual performance for disposable contact lenses.
    Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Madrid-Costa D; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 23770656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.