These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10555740)

  • 1. The on-eye dehydration of proclear compatibles lenses.
    Hall B; Jones S; Young G; Coleman S
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 10555740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers.
    Fonn D; Situ P; Simpson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 76(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 10524785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery of the water content of hydrogel contact lenses after use.
    Cabrera JV; Velasco MJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):452-7. PubMed ID: 16101953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Six month clinical evaluation of a biomimetic hydrogel contact lens.
    Young G; Bowers R; Hall B; Port M
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 9348446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population.
    Lemp MA; Caffery B; Lebow K; Lembach R; Park J; Foulks G; Hall B; Bowers R; McGarvey S; Young G
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 10073636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-eye dehydration of proclear, resolution 55G and acuvue contact lenses.
    Quesnel NM; Giasson CJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2001; 24(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 16303460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrogel contact lens ageing.
    Morgan PB; Efron N
    CLAO J; 2000 Apr; 26(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 10810938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Pritchard N; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jul; 15(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 7667020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydrogel contact lens dehydration in controlled environmental conditions.
    Morgan PB; Efron N; Morgan SL; Little SA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Apr; 30(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 15260358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials.
    Young G; Bowers R; Hall B; Port M
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 9348449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dryness and discomfort with silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Fonn D; Dumbleton K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jan; 29(1 Suppl):S101-4; discussion S115-8, S192-4. PubMed ID: 12772743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-eye optical quality of daily disposable contact lenses for different wearing times.
    Montés-Micó R; Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; García-Lázaro S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 23510388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology.
    Thai LC; Tomlinson A; Doane MG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Mar; 81(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 15017179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries].
    Peyre C; Fumery L; Gatinel D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16141922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of replacement schedule and care regimen on patient comfort and satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses.
    Malet F; Schnider CM
    CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):124-7. PubMed ID: 12144230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model.
    Suwala M; Glasier MA; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective comparison of 2 daily disposable contact lenses: Focus Dailies with AquaRelease and Proclear 1-Day.
    Scott WL; Rein MJ; Pack LD
    Optometry; 2010 Jan; 81(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions*.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Barrado-Navascués E; Rubido-Crespo MJ; Sugimoto K; Sawano T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 18565093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 1-Day Acuvue vs. Focus Dailies: a comparison of comfort, user preference, and incidence of corneal complications.
    Inaba M
    CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 10946985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.