These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10555864)

  • 1. Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Oct; 126(4):326-52. PubMed ID: 10555864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search for color and shape: when is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values?
    Becker SI; Harris AM; Venini D; Retell JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):264-91. PubMed ID: 23875572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations.
    Kerzel D; Born S; Schönhammer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22428670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term perceptual learning in visual conjunction search.
    Su Y; Lai Y; Huang W; Tan W; Qu Z; Ding Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1415-24. PubMed ID: 24730740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and performance on an everyday-based visual search task.
    Potter LM; Grealy MA; Elliott MA; Andrés P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jul; 140(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 22664318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task.
    Luck SJ; Fan S; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1993; 5(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 23972153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search.
    Poisson ME; Wilkinson F
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 1528701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collinearity impairs local element visual search.
    Jingling L; Tseng CH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 22329767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?
    Lamy D; Tsal Y; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):621-9. PubMed ID: 14620356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal networks.
    Donner TH; Kettermann A; Diesch E; Ostendorf F; Villringer A; Brandt SA
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 11771970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue relevance effects in conjunctive visual search: cueing for location, color, and orientation.
    Zhuang X; Papathomas TV
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21652771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.