These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10555864)

  • 21. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of task-irrelevant grouping on visual selection in partial report.
    Lunau R; Habekost T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 28364367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The spatial profile of the focus of attention in visual search: insights from MEG recordings.
    Hopf JM; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Tsotsos JK
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1312-20. PubMed ID: 20117126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets.
    Humphreys GW; Quinlan PT; Riddoch MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Sep; 118(3):258-79. PubMed ID: 2527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search.
    Takeda Y; Phillips S; Kumada T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 17455054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Transient structures": the effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches.
    Carrasco M; Ponte D; Rechea C; Sampedro MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Oct; 60(7):1243-58. PubMed ID: 9821785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 14769076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance.
    Levinthal BR; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The development of visual search in infants and very young children.
    Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Feb; 81(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 11786009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The involvement of posterior parietal cortex in feature and conjunction visuomotor search.
    Lane AR; Smith DT; Schenk T; Ellison A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1964-72. PubMed ID: 20849232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.
    Treisman A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):194-214. PubMed ID: 6461717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection.
    Becker SI; Ansorge U
    Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():18-28. PubMed ID: 23478194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?
    Raymond JE; Fenske MJ; Westoby N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 16366798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.