606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10557165)
1. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants.
Holmes DC; Loftus JT
J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 9477847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution.
Matsushita Y; Kitoh M; Mizuta K; Ikeda H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 2074593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone.
Isidor F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():8-18. PubMed ID: 16968378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
