These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10557894)

  • 1. Energizing corporate culture and creating competitive advantage: a new look at workforce programs.
    O'Daniell EE
    Benefits Q; 1999; 15(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 10557894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Models for skill-based pay plans.
    Bunning RL
    HRMAGAZINE; 1992 Feb; 37(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 10118721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structuring competitive physician compensation programs.
    Cotter TJ; Bonds RG
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1995 Dec; 49(12):52-6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10152896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corporate restructuring--strategic planning and redesign of employee benefits.
    Macey SJ
    Empl Benefits J; 1996 Dec; 21(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 10163214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MOM (motive, opportunity, and means) in the workplace--your path to competitive advantage.
    Langford PW; Sheehan PE
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1996 Nov; 18(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 10162370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten steps for communicating flex benefits.
    Bergh PD
    HRMAGAZINE; 1991 Apr; 36(4):46, 49-51. PubMed ID: 10111079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition still driving compensation. Execs' pay packages stay healthy even in climate of growing scrutiny.
    Evans M
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Jul; 37(30):S1-5. PubMed ID: 17824151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New salary system supports changing culture.
    Esquibel O; Ning J; Sugg J
    HRMAGAZINE; 1990 Oct; 35(10):43-8. PubMed ID: 10108165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top strategies to attract and keep RNs.
    OR Manager; 2001 Jul; 17(7):27-9. PubMed ID: 11467169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing a competitive benefits program.
    Hills LS
    J Med Pract Manage; 2005; 20(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 15779518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive compensation in excess of $1 million: shareholder approval and corporate waste.
    Kaderabek LM; Quinlan WJ
    Benefits Q; 1995; 11(3):96-101. PubMed ID: 10151121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new landscape: a fresh look at long-term incentives for corporate America.
    Cates DC; Costelloe AM
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 15015420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Looking for answers. Boards struggle to find the proper way to compensate executives.
    Bolster CJ; Hawthorne G
    Trustee; 2003; 56(10):8-13, 1. PubMed ID: 14650267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "perfect storm" in compensation: convergence of events leads to a greater need to review compensation strategies.
    Jones RB
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15015421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salary/career survey: hospitals. Duties are expanding, but are salaries keeping up?
    OR Manager; 1998 Oct; 14(10):1, 11-3, 16-25. PubMed ID: 10185620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In sync. Team-based incentives strike a chord.
    Dunn P
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1999 Oct; 8(10):18, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 10622821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salaries go up.
    Greenbaum P
    Health Facil Manage; 1995 Dec; 8(12):30, 32-4. PubMed ID: 10152921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new idea for physician compensation.
    Searcy MJ
    Med Group Manage; 1986; 33(6):28, 42-4. PubMed ID: 10279412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do you stack up?
    Burmahl B
    Health Facil Manage; 2001 Oct; 14(10):16-20. PubMed ID: 11680233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compensation vs. benefits: who gets paid more? A new survey analysis reveals the answer and possible causes.
    Reustle A; Schaeffer P
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Dec; 26(4):3-6. PubMed ID: 11817069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.