These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10557978)

  • 1. DRG-based per diem payment system matches costs more accurately.
    Brannen TJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Apr; 53(4):42-6. PubMed ID: 10557978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of hospital case mix, cost, and payment differences for Medicare, Medicaid, and Blue Cross Plan patients using DRGs.
    Martin SG; Frick AP; Shwartz M
    Inquiry; 1984; 21(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 6240468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Avoiding managed care pricing pitfalls.
    Schwartzben D; Finkler SA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Jul; 51(7):68-70, 72. PubMed ID: 10168442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative methods of hospital remuneration in Israel.
    Ginsberg G; Penchas S; Israeli A
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991 Oct; 27(10):583-9. PubMed ID: 1955316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distributional implications of using relative prices in DRG payment systems.
    Thorpe KE
    Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2951338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are national DRG rates the best choice for PPS?
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1985 Aug; 39(8):62-6. PubMed ID: 10311204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case-mix payment in Japanese medical care.
    Okamura S; Kobayashi R; Sakamaki T
    Health Policy; 2005 Nov; 74(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 16226139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choosing an advantageous risk-sharing arrangement.
    Cherney A
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Mar; 53(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 10351053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of DRG payment on New Jersey hospitals.
    Hsiao WC; Dunn DL
    Inquiry; 1987; 24(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 2958411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.
    Atkinson G; Murray R
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2008; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18162791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicaid and Blue Cross DRG payment plans: a comparison.
    Grimaldi PL
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):48-55, 79-80. PubMed ID: 10311310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective per diem rates for skilled nursing care.
    Grimaldi PL
    J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):49-62. PubMed ID: 12079151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(161):48433-9084. PubMed ID: 18956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Payment of hospital cardiac services.
    Unger WJ
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1991; 10(26):1-148. PubMed ID: 10115896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New risk-adjusted Medicare payment system promises more accurate patient profiles.
    Public Sect Contract Rep; 1998 Dec; 4(12):185-7. PubMed ID: 10339119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bundling post-acute care (PAC) with Medicare DRG payments: an exploration of the distributional and risk consequences.
    Lee AJ; Ellis RP; Merrill AR
    Inquiry; 1996; 33(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 8883462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent evidence on case-based systems for setting hospital rates.
    Hellinger FJ
    Inquiry; 1985; 22(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 2933335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of medical group practice and physician payment methods on costs of care.
    Kralewski JE; Rich EC; Feldman R; Dowd BE; Bernhardt T; Johnson C; Gold W
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Aug; 35(3):591-613. PubMed ID: 10966087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negotiating payment for new technology purchases.
    Kaden RJ; Vaul JH; Palazola PA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Dec; 56(12):44-8. PubMed ID: 12516159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.