These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10558295)
1. Casemix classification systems. Fetter RB Aust Health Rev; 1999; 22(2):16-34; discussion 35-8. PubMed ID: 10558295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and localisation of casemix applications for inpatient hospital activity in EU member states. Wiley MM Aust Health Rev; 1999; 22(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 10558298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicare payment system for hospital inpatients: diagnosis-related groups. Baker JJ J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):1-13. PubMed ID: 12079147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare's fee schedule for hospital outpatient care. Grimaldi PL J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):14-31. PubMed ID: 12079149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups. Fetter RB J Soc Health Syst; 1992; 3(4):4-15. PubMed ID: 1288673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Payment system under consideration of casemix--DRGs is applicable in Japan? Kawabuchi K Jpn Hosp; 2000 Jul; (19):23-41. PubMed ID: 11142219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision of the CPI hospital services component. Cardenas EM Mon Labor Rev; 1996 Dec; 119(12):40-8. PubMed ID: 10166726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities are now paid prospective rates. Grimaldi PL J Health Care Finance; 2002; 28(3):32-48. PubMed ID: 12079150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA's new 'transfer DRGs' can cost your hospital money. Birmingham J Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Apr; 24(4):59-61. PubMed ID: 10351062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What proposed DRG refinements mean for hospitals. Part III. Shoemaker P Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(5):6, 8-11. PubMed ID: 10137370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The dynamic of the outpatient prospective payment system within the hospital setting. Thevnin C J Health Care Finance; 2000; 27(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 11140549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2004 rates. Final rule. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2003 Aug; 68(148):45345-672. PubMed ID: 12901385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Put competition into PPS. How Medicare can save money by allowing hospitals to offer DRG discounts. Averill RF Mod Healthc; 1997 Dec; 27(48):54. PubMed ID: 10174993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparing for the inpatient rehabilitation PPS. Rielinger JA Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Dec; 55(12):52-5. PubMed ID: 11765633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Déjà vu. When it comes to prospective payment, home health agencies can learn from the experiences of acute care hospitals with DRGs. Dray PB Health Manag Technol; 2002 Oct; 23(10):44-6, 50. PubMed ID: 12380207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HFMA forums toolbox. Medicare checklists for assessing reimbursement under MS-DRGs. Thompson D; Wolters T Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Nov; 62(11):125-6. PubMed ID: 18990846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential for casemix in Ireland. Goggin M Ir J Med Sci; 1992 Jul; 161(7):455-7. PubMed ID: 1428767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 1999 rates--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(147):40954-1131. PubMed ID: 10181718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]