These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10558578)

  • 1. Banning human cloning: an acceptable limit on scientific inquiry or an unconstitutional restriction of symbolic speech?
    Hsu MB
    Georgetown Law J; 1999 Jul; 87(7):2399-430. PubMed ID: 10558578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prospect of human cloning: improving nature or dooming the species?
    Daar JF
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(3):511-72. PubMed ID: 12894781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Well, hello Dolly! The advent of cloning legislation and its constitutional implications.
    Jackson KM
    SMU Law Rev; 1999; 52(1):283-304. PubMed ID: 10558399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Banning "human cloning": a study in the difficulties of defining science.
    Greely HT
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1998; 8(1):131-52. PubMed ID: 15085839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case against blanket First Amendment protection of scientific research: articulating a more limited scope of protection.
    Keane S
    Stanford Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 59(2):505-50. PubMed ID: 17153275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a constitutional right to clone?
    Sunstein CR
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):987-1005. PubMed ID: 15508211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cloning and the LGBTI family: cautious optimism.
    Aloni E
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):1-80. PubMed ID: 21774156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The constitutional implications of human cloning.
    Foley EP
    Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cloning human beings and the consumer of the future: a worthwhile endeavor or a nightmare come true?
    Frankel A
    Loyola Consum Law Rev; 2001; 13(2):149-87. PubMed ID: 15977332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The children of ART (assisted reproductive technology): should the law protect them from harm?
    Rosato JL
    Utah Law Rev; 2004; 2004(1):57-110. PubMed ID: 16755703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Governmental control of research in positive eugenics.
    Bass IS
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1974; 7(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 11661095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baa, baa cloned sheep, have you any law? Legislative responses to animal cloning in the European Union and the United States.
    Ratner SJ
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1999; 22(1):141-57. PubMed ID: 12666689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human reproductive cloning: a policy framework for South Africa.
    Jordaan DW
    S Afr Law J; 2002; 119(Part 2):294-304. PubMed ID: 15164746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cloning and the preservation of family integrity.
    Orentlicher D
    LA Law Rev; 1999; 59(4):1019-40. PubMed ID: 15156888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; policy interpretation--Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(197):58509-11. PubMed ID: 10244079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nondiscrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance from HEW: proposed rules.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Sep; 44(186):22108-20. PubMed ID: 10243424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sixth Circuit: individual cannot sue HHS to enforce Hill-Burton obligations.
    Peterson RN
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun; 8(13):8-9. PubMed ID: 10272364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Will the US clone alone?
    Nat Med; 2001 Mar; 7(3):257. PubMed ID: 11231596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Report on cloning by the US Bioethics Advisory Commission: ethical considerations.
    Hum Reprod Update; 1997; 3(6):629-41. PubMed ID: 9584950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.