These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1055908)

  • 1. Medical practice and contingent legal fee.
    Blackman NS
    N Y State J Med; 1975 Jul; 75(8):1295-8. PubMed ID: 1055908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lawyers' Contingent Fee--protection for physicians.
    Rose EF
    J Iowa Med Soc; 1974 Mar; 64(3):111-3. PubMed ID: 4815400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contingent fees in medical malpractice litigation - a qualitative assessment.
    Ottensmeyer DJ; Smith HL; Porter J
    West J Med; 1983 Aug; 139(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 6636743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contingent fees. A lawyer's viewpoint.
    Friedman SD
    N Y State J Med; 1975 Jul; 75(8):1301-3. PubMed ID: 1055909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symposium: health science liability. Law and medicine: conflict or cooperation?
    Grove AS
    Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1972; 76(3):714-7. PubMed ID: 4667680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contingent fee: disciplinary rule, ethical consideration, or free competition?
    Busath LE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1982 Apr; 26(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7040129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malpractice insurance rates reach boiling point. Physicians burned by lawyers, lawsuits and jury awards.
    Weber DO
    Physician Exec; 2002; 28(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 11957403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Considerations on the physician's professional liability].
    Dérobert L
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1971 May; 155(17):357-71. PubMed ID: 4940768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics, money, and the problem of coercion in managed behavioral health care.
    Petrila J
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1996; 40(2):359-405. PubMed ID: 11660534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Law and the surgeon.
    Norton ML
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1972 May; 134(5):851-8. PubMed ID: 5064082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in state society's professional liability insurance program.
    Mannix AJ
    N Y State J Med; 1971 Nov; 71(22):2686-7. PubMed ID: 5286608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Charges for obstetric liability insurance and discontinuation of obstetric practice in New York.
    Grumbach K; Vranizan K; Rennie D; Luft HS
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jan; 44(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 9010372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of the medical malpractice crisis on OB-GYNs and patients in southern New Jersey.
    Donlen J; Puro JS
    N J Med; 2003 Sep; 100(9):12-9. PubMed ID: 14556589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Law-medicine notes: report of the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Aug; 289(5):252-3. PubMed ID: 4713765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malpractice insurance rates--what's the answer?
    Appleman JA
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1975; 3(10):. PubMed ID: 1081564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Trust and legal rights in the physician-patient relationship].
    Deutsch E
    Chirurg; 1980 Jun; 51(6):407-10. PubMed ID: 7449542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On frivolity and the malpractice cafeteria. A crisis contingent on lawyers' fees.
    Edwards FJ
    Group Pract J; 1989; 38(1):20-2, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10292130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What about a malpractice surcharge.
    Weiss GG
    Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):54-7. PubMed ID: 15357178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY PROBLEMS FOR THE PRACTITIONER.
    SADUSK JF
    Md State Med J; 1964 Jun; 13():54-7. PubMed ID: 14160582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
    Dwyer CL
    Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.