These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10559730)

  • 1. Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems.
    Epstein DD; Epstein PL; Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 10559730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17207077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments.
    Fromentin O; Picard B; Tavernier B
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 11(3):391-7; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 10379298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 8820805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):624-8. PubMed ID: 10842128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentive force of O-ring attachment to use Immediate Provisional Implant (IPI)-retained overdenture.
    Kobayashi M; Ohkubo C; Suzuki Y; Aoki T; Sato J; Hosoi T
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 13(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 16411569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-supported overdentures: the ZAAG attachment system.
    Davidoff SR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Nov; 18(11):1144-8, 1150-1. PubMed ID: 9533347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.