These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10559736)

  • 1. Two-step pick-up impression procedure for implant-retained overdentures.
    Gregory-Head B; LaBarre E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):615-6. PubMed ID: 10559736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attachment-retained overdentures: the most cost-effective implant solution for the edentulous arch.
    Strong SM
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19552359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical tips for constructing a maxillary implant-supported overdenture by using a double-impression technique.
    Uludag B; Sahin V; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(3):142-4. PubMed ID: 18616075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement-retained bar attachment system for implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Ozcelik TB; Ozcelik O; Pektas ZO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 17547953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of mandibular denture base deformation with different impression techniques for implant overdentures.
    Elsyad MA; El-Waseef FA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():127-33. PubMed ID: 22250917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
    Zouras CS; Winkler S; Thaler JJ
    Implant Dent; 1995; 4(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 7550086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with implant-supported overdentures using prefabricated telescopic copings.
    Phay YM; Tan BT
    Singapore Dent J; 2005 Dec; 27(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 16438266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of guide planes and implant supported bar overdentures: a case report.
    Schneider AL
    Implant Dent; 1998; 7(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9588973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternate pressure-free functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 20553174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
    Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A survey of implant-retained superstructure types in the edentulous mandible in The Netherlands].
    de Baat C; Cune MS; Carlsson GE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 16300321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of laser-welded titanium framework technology: a case report for the totally edentulous patient.
    Jackson BJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):294-300. PubMed ID: 16447902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fabrication of a maxillary implant-supported overdenture retained by two cemented bars: a clinical report.
    Uludag B; Sahin V; Celik G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 17547940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tooth position index for the fabrication of a mandibular implant-supported overdenture bar.
    Fridrich T; Foo H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 9656183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft liner-retained, implant-supported overdenture: a technical note.
    Cain JR; Mitchell DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):857-60. PubMed ID: 9857598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.