These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10559743)

  • 21. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
    Lünstedt B; Debus S
    Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biodegradation of absorbable sutures in body fluids and pH buffers.
    Freudenberg S; Rewerk S; Kaess M; Weiss C; Dorn-Beinecke A; Post S
    Eur Surg Res; 2004; 36(6):376-85. PubMed ID: 15591748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Tendon sutures with a new monofilament synthetic absorbable suture material (PDS-suture of 6-0 strength). Results of animal experiments].
    Albers W; Geldmacher J; Giedl H; Beyer W
    Chirurg; 1982 Mar; 53(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6802585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparison of the physical parameters and handling properties of short-duration and middle-duration absorbable suture materials].
    Thiede A; Stüwe W; Lünstedt B
    Chirurg; 1985 Dec; 56(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 3002727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.
    Kim JC; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Dec; 18(12):2363-9. PubMed ID: 17569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
    Bariol SV; Stewart GD; Tolley DA
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of inflammatory synovial fluid on the breaking strength of new "long lasting" absorbable sutures.
    Barber FA; Click JN
    Arthroscopy; 1992; 8(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1466701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of commonly used surgical solutions on the tensile strength of absorbable sutures: an in-vitro study.
    Cawthorne DP; Castillo TE; Sivakumar BS
    ANZ J Surg; 2021 Jul; 91(7-8):1451-1454. PubMed ID: 33928746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hydrolytic degradation and morphologic study of poly-p-dioxanone.
    Lin HL; Chu CC; Grubb D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Feb; 27(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 8436572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro evaluation of the stability of mechanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions.
    Chu CC; Moncrief G
    Ann Surg; 1983 Aug; 198(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 6870380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Degradation behaviors of bioabsorbable P3/4HB monofilament suture in vitro and in vivo.
    Chen X; Yang X; Pan J; Wang L; Xu K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2010 Feb; 92(2):447-55. PubMed ID: 19927337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures.
    Debus ES; Geiger D; Sailer M; Ederer J; Thiede A
    Eur Surg Res; 1997; 29(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9013106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effect of Chlorhexidine and Listerine® Mouthwashes on the Tensile Strength of Selected Absorbable Sutures: An
    Alsarhan M; Alnofaie H; Ateeq R; Almahdy A
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8531706. PubMed ID: 30539024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A review of absorbable suture materials in head & neck surgery and introduction of monocryl: a new absorbable suture.
    LaBagnara J
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Jun; 74(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 7628331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of pH on the in vitro degradation of poly(glycolide lactide) copolymer absorbable sutures.
    Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Mar; 16(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 7061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.