These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1055997)

  • 1. [Deformation of elastomer impression materials in removal from the under edge].
    Koppang R
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1975 May; 85(5):193-7. PubMed ID: 1055997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Examination of the consistency of elastomer impression materials].
    Franz G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Aug; 27(8):665-74. PubMed ID: 4505926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of different impression materials. Part II. Surface porosity, reproduction of fine details and hardness of stone casts.
    Badawy MM; Sanad ME; Bahnassawy HI; Shalaby HS
    Egypt Dent J; 1987 Jan; 33(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 3472873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Principles for impression and impression materials].
    Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Feb; 27(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 4551313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental studies on various model materials. 2. Comparative studies on hardness and abrasion].
    Bernau R; Meyer B; Moritz T
    Stomatol DDR; 1979 Jun; 29(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 291188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative studies on model materials for crowns and bridges].
    Lehmann K; Lange G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1973 Aug; 28(8):819-23. PubMed ID: 4517091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Experimental studies on various model material. 3. Dimensional behavior and reproductive fidelity as compared to those of elastomers].
    Bernau R; Meyer B; Moritz T
    Stomatol DDR; 1980 Jan; 30(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 6932111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Working time and setting time of elastomeric impression materials].
    Viohl J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):598-603. PubMed ID: 4557298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The accuracy of post-impressions with silicone-rubber impression materials and polysulfide-rubber impression materials].
    Aoyama S; Sano Y; Enomoto M; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 6935848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Büchler A; Lauer HC; Hoffmann A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 11951807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Copper electroplating of non-aqueous elastomeric impression materials: a subjective appraisal of their platability.
    Payne JA; Jeganathan S
    Singapore Dent J; 1994 Jan; 19(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 9582678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Elastic impression materials and die materials. 1. Combination of impression and die materials].
    Tahara K; Numazawa H; Ishikawa N; Ota Y; Haga M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1972 Feb; 72(2):360-6. PubMed ID: 4501603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the results obtained on various conditions of processing. 4. Comparison of the capsule mixing technic for alginate impression material and model plaster and mechanical processing].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jul; 24(7):452-7. PubMed ID: 4526357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental stone and improved dental stone surface hardness: the effect of the addition of potassium salts.
    Diakoyanni IN; Kaloyannides AM; Panagiotouni EG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1306740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative accuracy of elastomer impression materials.
    Hembree JH
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1974 Oct; 54(4):164-7. PubMed ID: 4534222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies].
    Nakamura Y
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material.
    Tan HK; Hooper PM; Baergen CG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 8957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.