BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10560075)

  • 1. Comparison of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix.
    Abdelhak YE; Sheen JJ; Kuczynski E; Bianco A
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(4):250-2. PubMed ID: 10560075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cerclage in early pregnancy.
    Angel JL; Pietrantoni M; O'Brien WF; Knuppel RA
    J Perinatol; 1991 Sep; 11(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 1919825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mid-trimester emergent cerclage: a ten year single institution review.
    Chasen ST; Silverman NS
    J Perinatol; 1998; 18(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 9766407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of second-trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence.
    Lipitz S; Libshitz A; Oelsner G; Kokia E; Goldenberg M; Mashiach S; Schiff E
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Oct; 13(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 8960611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of patients undergoing transabdominal cerclage: a descriptive study.
    Turnquest MA; Britton KA; Brown HL
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(5):225-7. PubMed ID: 10475505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amnioreduction in emergency cerclage with prolapsed membranes: comparison of two methods for reducing the membranes.
    Locatelli A; Vergani P; Bellini P; Strobelt N; Arreghini A; Ghidini A
    Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 10355913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor?
    Abdelhak YE; Aronov R; Roque H; Young BK
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(6):453-7. PubMed ID: 11155431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transvaginal placement of cervicoisthmic cerclage: report on pregnancy outcome.
    Katz M; Abrahams C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1989-92; discussion 1992-4. PubMed ID: 15970870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric management of incompetent cervix and bulging fetal membranes.
    Schorr SJ; Morales WJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 8728074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.
    Odibo AO; Berghella V; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Perinatol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 17195146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of elective and empiric cerclage and the role of emergency cerclage.
    Cardosi RJ; Chez RA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 9775991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage.
    Davis G; Berghella V; Talucci M; Wapner RJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):836-9. PubMed ID: 11035322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective and emergency transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence.
    Hole J; Tressler T; Martinez F
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 12971139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Efficacy of elective cerclage in patients with cervical incompetence and associated risk factors].
    Nava Flores J; Morales Toia ME; Veloz Martínez G; Hernández-Valencia M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jul; 71():356-62. PubMed ID: 14515667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergency cerclage in cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with a short cervix at the time of surgery and relationship to perinatal outcome.
    Salomon LJ; Nasr B; Nizard J; Bernard JP; Essaoui M; Bussieres L; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(13):1256-61. PubMed ID: 19039797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical cerclage with buried prosthetic band: technique, indications and results in a series of 28 pregnancies].
    Gervaise A; Senat MV; Audibert F; Frydman R; Fernandez H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Oct; 29(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 11084465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bridge Suture for Successful McDonald Emergency Cerclage.
    Tanaka M; Hori Y; Shirafuji A; Kato M; Kato J; Kobayashi H; Tsuchida T; Fukae T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):446-452. PubMed ID: 27771710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of cervical cerclage.
    Bassaw B; Roopnarinesingh S
    West Indian Med J; 1990 Mar; 39(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 2185595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cervical cerclage--when is it effective?].
    Mikhova M; Dimitrova V; Tsankova M
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(7):6-11. PubMed ID: 17489162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.