These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10560334)

  • 1. The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):534-45. PubMed ID: 10560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system.
    Bryan S; Weatherburn G; Buxton M; Watkins J; Keen J; Muris N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1999 Oct; 4(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 10623035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entrance doses during lateral lumbar spine and antero-posterior abdomen examinations: generator waveform dependence.
    Morrison GD; Underwood AC
    Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):491-4. PubMed ID: 7788234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The radiation exposure associated with cervical and lumbar spine radiographs.
    Simpson AK; Whang PG; Jonisch A; Haims A; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):409-12. PubMed ID: 18679095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S; Weatherburn G; Watkins J; Roddie M; Keen J; Muris N; Buxton MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 9574575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; West M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):653-60. PubMed ID: 10624322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PACS: effect on incidental findings.
    Green L
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 14994834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
    Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose implications of fluoroscopy-guided positioning (FGP) for lumbar spine examinations prior to acquiring plain film radiographs.
    Saunders M; Budden A; Maciver F; Teunis M; Warren-Forward H
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 78(926):130-4. PubMed ID: 15681324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Weatherburn GC; Bryan S; Davies JG
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):707-12. PubMed ID: 11110932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Picture archiving and communication system: effect on reporting of incidental findings.
    Wagner SC; Morrison WB; Carrino JA; Schweitzer ME; Nothnagel H
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):500-5. PubMed ID: 12409587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.
    Weatherburn GC; Davies JG
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):856-63. PubMed ID: 10645191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology.
    Bor D; Sancak T; Olgar T; Elcim Y; Adanali A; Sanlidilek U; Akyar S
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Apr; 77(916):315-22. PubMed ID: 15107322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of patient doses from conventional diagnostic radiographic examinations in Syria.
    Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 20332131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study.
    Chan CTP; Fung KKL
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 31052066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The comparative measurement of the bone marrow dose in quantitative computed tomography (QCT), dual-photon radiography (DPX) and conventional x-rays of the LS].
    Kasperczyk A; Freyschmidt J; Well JC; Seeger W
    Rofo; 1991 Aug; 155(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1878543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Body build and radiation exposure in static roentgen studies (I): A contribution for determining a national reference dose value. Promoted by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (St.Sch 4163)].
    Golder W; Weiner G
    Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 11471299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.