236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10560507)
1. DNA quantitation of distal bile duct carcinoma measured by image and flow cytometry.
Rijken AM; Belien JA; van Gulik TM; Polak MM; Offerhaus GJ; Gouma DJ; Baak JP
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1999 Aug; 21(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 10560507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow and image cytometry in thymic neoplasia: correlation with clinical outcome.
Kenny-Moynihan MB; DeRose PB; Gal AA; Chakraborty H; Cohen C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 11531146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy analysis in breast carcinoma. Comparison of unfixed and fixed tissue analyzed by image and flow cytometry.
Ottesen GL; Christensen IJ; Larsen JK; Larsen J; Christiansen J; Baldetorp B; Linden T; Hansen B; Andersen JA
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Oct; 19(5):413-22. PubMed ID: 9349901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: comparison of flow and image cytometry with clinical follow-up in 93 patients.
Dreinhöfer KE; Baldetorp B; Akerman M; Fernö M; Rydholm A; Gustafson P
Cytometry; 2002 Feb; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11857594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow and image cytometric DNA ploidy, including 5c exceeding cells, of serous borderline malignant ovarian tumors. Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics.
Flezar MS; But I; Kavalar R; Us-Krasovec M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Jun; 25(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 12882085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA quantification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by flow cytometry and cytophotometric image analysis using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
Dorman AM; Walsh TN; Droogan O; Curran B; Hourihane DO; Hennessy TP; Leader M
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 1459005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caveats in the estimation of DNA-ploidy in paraffin embedded specimens of primary prostate cancer and lymph node metastases by flow and image cytometry.
Berner A; Danielsen HE; Juul NO; Juul ME; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Nesland JM; Fosså SD
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov; 5(6):339-52. PubMed ID: 8305330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image cytometry of breast carcinomas that are DNA diploid by flow cytometry: time to revise the concept of DNA diploidy?
Alanen KA; Lintu M; Joensuu H
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Jun; 20(3):178-86. PubMed ID: 9642444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gross genomic damage measured by DNA image cytometry independently predicts gastric cancer patient survival.
Belien JA; Buffart TE; Gill AJ; Broeckaert MA; Quirke P; Meijer GA; Grabsch HI
Br J Cancer; 2009 Sep; 101(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 19738619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA image cytometry on sections compared with flow cytometry in human bone metastases.
Wohlrab D; Klapperstück T; Holzhausen HJ; Held A; Hein W
Oncol Rep; 2005 Oct; 14(4):1005-12. PubMed ID: 16142365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA ploidy measurement in oral leukoplakia: different results between flow and image cytometry.
Brouns ER; Bloemena E; Belien JA; Broeckaert MA; Aartman IH; van der Waal I
Oral Oncol; 2012 Jul; 48(7):636-40. PubMed ID: 22342568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative DNA analysis in renal cell carcinoma. Comparison of flow and image cytometry.
Papadopoulos I; Weichert-Jacobsen K; Nürnberg N; Sprenger E
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 8526952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer.
Kaern J; Wetteland J; Tropé CG; Farrants GW; Juhng SW; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Danielsen HE
Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 1576895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of DNA flow cytometry and image cytometry on effusion fluid.
Saha I; Dey P; Vhora H; Nijhawan R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10649516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA quantification in colorectal carcinoma using flow and image analysis cytometry.
Fausel RE; Burleigh W; Kaminsky DB
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1990 Feb; 12(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 2405870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy pattern on bile duct cancer].
Sato Y; Tanaka J; Seki H; Kato Y; Umezawa A; Koyama K
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Apr; 95(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 8196593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma.
Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Determination, by in situ hybridization on interphasic nucleus, a cytogenetic DNA index; application to breast cancer; comparison of this DNA index to DNA indexes determined by imaging and flow cytometry].
Vago P; Lecart S; Simony J; Lequeux N; Radal M; Bureau JP
Morphologie; 2000 Mar; 84(264):41-8. PubMed ID: 10923339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
