These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10560608)
41. [Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of a radioimmunologic assay: the example of thyroid tests]. Fragu P Pathol Biol (Paris); 1989 Jan; 37(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 2648271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Differential diagnosis in immunohistochemistry with Bayes theorem. Vollmer RT Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 May; 131(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 19369634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making. Proeve M Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a fetal risk-scoring system. Chard T; Learmont J; Carroll S; Hudson C; Lloyd DS; Sloan D Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):388-93. PubMed ID: 1418141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Modeling the clinical assessment of men with suspected obstructed voiding using Bayes' Theorem. Caffarel J; Griffiths C; Pickard R; Robson W; Drinnan M Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 18508333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Bayesian estimation of sensitivity and specificity of serum ELISA and faecal culture for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in Greek dairy sheep and goats. Kostoulas P; Leontides L; Enøe C; Billinis C; Florou M; Sofia M Prev Vet Med; 2006 Sep; 76(1-2):56-73. PubMed ID: 16806541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Bayesian analysis of ergometry test]. de Brito AH Arq Bras Cardiol; 1991 Feb; 56(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 1872729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Decision-making model for a non-invasive diagnosis of compensated liver cirrhosis. Marmo R; Romano M; de Sio I; Peduto A; Caporaso N; Persico M; Coltorti M Ital J Gastroenterol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8428017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. HIV testing strategies: test performance is important, but not sufficient. Cota GF; de Abreu Ferrari TC; de Sousa MR Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2011 Feb; 9(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 21342068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Henderson AR Ann Clin Biochem; 1993 Nov; 30 ( Pt 6)():521-39. PubMed ID: 8304720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Rational use of diagnostic and screening tests. McKenzie BA J Small Anim Pract; 2021 Nov; 62(11):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 34196003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Commentary: black and white or shades of grey? Battaglia M; Pewsner D Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 12714555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. What is gold standard and what is ground truth? Cardoso JR; Pereira LM; Iversen MD; Ramos AL Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 25715714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. Glas AS; Lijmer JG; Prins MH; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 56(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 14615004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic and prognostic test assessment in emergency medicine: likelihood and diagnostic odds ratios. Marill KA Emerg Med J; 2022 Aug; 39(8):635-642. PubMed ID: 35078856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Statistics from the inside. 14. Diagnostic and screening tests and reference values. Healy MJ Arch Dis Child; 1995 Apr; 72(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 7763075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Null results when diagnostic tests are imperfect. Reibnegger G; Hausen A; Wachter H Lancet; 1989 Nov; 2(8674):1276. PubMed ID: 2573784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment and representation of prior beliefs: unexpected implications of the uniform distribution. Nease RF; Owens DK Med Decis Making; 1990; 10(2):112-4, discussion 114-5. PubMed ID: 2348753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]