These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10560979)

  • 1. Comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor sperm: a meta-analysis.
    Goldberg JM; Mascha E; Falcone T; Attaran M
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Nov; 72(5):792-5. PubMed ID: 10560979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
    Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
    Carroll N; Palmer JR
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
    Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
    Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
    Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm.
    Byrd W; Bradshaw K; Carr B; Edman C; Odom J; Ackerman G
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 2307249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
    Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrauterine insemination: is it an effective treatment for male factor infertility?
    Ford WC; Mathur RS; Hull MG
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Dec; 11(4):691-710. PubMed ID: 9692011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one?
    Chavkin DE; Molinaro TA; Roe AH; Sammel MD; Dokras A
    J Androl; 2012; 33(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21636733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 10796709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WITHDRAWN: Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
    O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (4):CD000317. PubMed ID: 17636628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
    Westergaard LG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ; Al-Inany H; Heineman MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001502. PubMed ID: 15266448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa.
    Wainer R; Merlet F; Ducot B; Bailly M; Tribalat S; Lombroso R
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2919-22. PubMed ID: 8747045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm: a prospective randomized trial comparing three different sperm preparation techniques.
    Byrd W; Drobnis EZ; Kutteh WH; Marshburn P; Carr BR
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Oct; 62(4):850-6. PubMed ID: 7926098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies in frozen donor semen procreation.
    Le Lannou D; Gastard E; Guivarch A; Laurent MC; Poulain P
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1765-74. PubMed ID: 8582977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is the limitation to 6 cycles of insemination with donor sperm justified?].
    Le Lannou D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Feb; 30(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11910881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates?
    Zarek SM; Hill MJ; Richter KS; Wu M; DeCherney AH; Osheroff JE; Levens ED
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 24934490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.