148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10561092)
1. Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions.
Drew PJ; Turnbull LW; Chatterjee S; Read J; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Monson JR; Kerin MJ
Ann Surg; 1999 Nov; 230(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 10561092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer.
Drew PJ; Chatterjee S; Turnbull LW; Read J; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Monson JR; Kerin MJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 1999 Sep; 6(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 10493630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer.
Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW; Smith A; Drew PJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Feb; 29(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12559074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
Kerslake RW; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Read JR; Bowsley SJ; Buckley DL; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1995 Jul; 50(7):440-54. PubMed ID: 7614789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Kneeshaw PJ; Lowry M; Manton D; Hubbard A; Drew PJ; Turnbull LW
Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16002292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Replace fine needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer.
Clarke D; Sudhakaran N; Gateley CA
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Mar; 83(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 11320918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of gadoteric acid and gadobutrol for detection as well as morphologic and dynamic characterization of lesions on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Renz DM; Durmus T; Böttcher J; Taupitz M; Diekmann F; Huppertz A; Pfeil A; Maurer MH; Streitparth F; Bick U; Hamm B; Fallenberg EM
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 24637587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Pinker K; Moy L; Sutton EJ; Mann RM; Weber M; Thakur SB; Jochelson MS; Bago-Horvath Z; Morris EA; Baltzer PA; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2018 Oct; 53(10):587-595. PubMed ID: 29620604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in pre-surgical evaluation of breast malignant lesions in dense breasts: a single center study.
Bozzini A; Nicosia L; Pruneri G; Maisonneuve P; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Vingiani A; Cassano E; Mastropasqua MG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Dec; 184(3):723-731. PubMed ID: 32860166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.
Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Perbeck L; Boné B
Acta Radiol; 2002 May; 43(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12100324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration.
Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis.
Wiener JI; Schilling KJ; Adami C; Obuchowski NA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):878-86. PubMed ID: 15728612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer?
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Dominelli V; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17203383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to improve accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Ma D; Lu F; Zou X; Zhang H; Li Y; Zhang L; Chen L; Qin D; Wang B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():175-179. PubMed ID: 27742437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triple assessment of breast lump.
Ahmed I; Nazir R; Chaudhary MY; Kundi S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Sep; 17(9):535-8. PubMed ID: 17903400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.
Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D; Zhang Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32799808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
