These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10561646)

  • 21. Comparison of Portapres with standard sphygmomanometry in pregnancy.
    Hehenkamp WJ; Rang S; van Goudoever J; Bos WJ; Wolf H; van der Post JA
    Hypertens Pregnancy; 2002; 21(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12044344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for use in anesthetized cats.
    Pedersen KM; Butler MA; Ersbøll AK; Pedersen HD
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Sep; 221(5):646-50. PubMed ID: 12216901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometry.
    Brown MA; Buddle ML; Cario GM; Whitworth JA
    Am J Hypertens; 1993 Sep; 6(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 8110427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Jones CR; Taylor K; Poston L; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Mar; 15(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11317204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy.
    Shennan AH; Kissane J; de Swiet M
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Oct; 100(10):904-8. PubMed ID: 8217971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Baseline check of blood pressure readings of an automated device in severe pre-eclampsia and healthy normotensive pregnancy.
    Ngene NC; Moodley J
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2018 Apr; 12():47-52. PubMed ID: 29674198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The assessment of blood pressure in pregnant women: pitfalls and novel approaches.
    Hurrell A; Webster L; Chappell LC; Shennan AH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2S):S804-S818. PubMed ID: 33514455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multicenter assessment of the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines.
    White WB; Susser W; James GD; Marra L; McCabe EJ; Pickering TG; Streeten DH
    Am J Hypertens; 1994 Jun; 7(6):509-14. PubMed ID: 7917148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
    Zeng WF; Liu M; Kang YY; Li Y; Wang JG
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Aug; 18(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 23681206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A simulation-based evaluation of nine oscillometric blood pressure monitors for self-measurement.
    Ng KG
    Blood Press Monit; 2000; 5(5-6):297-322. PubMed ID: 11153054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard ausculatory method using a mercury manometer.
    Mufunda J; Sparks B; Chifamba J; Dakwa C; Matenga JA; Adams JM; Sparks HV
    Cent Afr J Med; 1996 Aug; 42(8):230-2. PubMed ID: 8990566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. There is poor agreement between manual auscultatory and automated oscillometric methods for the measurement of blood pressure in normotensive pregnant women.
    Pomini F; Scavo M; Ferrazzani S; De Carolis S; Caruso A; Mancuso S
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Dec; 10(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 11798450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.